Agent skill

ylj-thesis-and-contribution

Use when sharpening the central legal-scholarly claim and contribution for a The Yale Law Journal (YLJ) piece. It forces a falsifiable, generalist thesis and names the contribution type; it does not search prior literature (use ylj-preemption-check) or build the argument (use ylj-argument-structure).

brycew6m4,252★ · +31/wk · 3 repos on radarProfile →
claude-codeMIT
Install
npx skills add brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills --skill ylj-thesis-and-contribution --agent claude-code

Same command for any agent — swap --agent for codex, cursor, copilot.

Facts
Files in the skill folder: 1
SKILL.md size: 8 KB
Bundled scripts: none
Path: Yale-Law-Journal-Skills/skills/ylj-thesis-and-contribution/SKILL.md
Open the folder on GitHub →
Where it comes from
Stars: 984 · +31 this week
Language: Stata
Read our review of the source →

Weekly change comes from our own snapshots, not the repository page — it measures attention, not adoption.

From the SKILL.md

# Thesis & Contribution (ylj-thesis-and-contribution) A YLJ piece lives or dies on a **single, sharp claim** that a generalist reader can restate. Student editors (and faculty advisors they consult) reject pieces whose "thesis" is really a topic or a survey. This skill nails the claim and labels the contribution; it does not yet prove novelty (`ylj-preemption-check`) or sequence the argument (`ylj-argument-structure`). ## When to trigger - You can name the *area* but cannot state the *claim* in one sentence - A reader asks "so what's the argument?" and you give a paragraph, not a sentence - The introduction promises several things and the reader cannot tell which is the point - You are unsure whether the contribution is descriptive, doctrinal, theoretical, or normative ## The one-sentence thesis test Write: **"This [Article/Essay] argues that ____, and therefore ____."** It must be: - **Contestable** — a smart reader could disagree; if no one would dispute it, it is not a thesis. - **Generalist** — legible to a reader outside the subfield (see `ylj-topic-selection`). - **Load-bearing** — every Part of the piece exists to establish or apply this claim. - **Yours** — it is the move *

What's inside
Steps it walks through
  1. When to trigger
  2. The one-sentence thesis test
  3. Name the contribution (most YLJ pieces blend two)
  4. Build the YLJ contribution contract
  5. Student-editor screen
  6. Preemption handoff
  7. Stress-test the contribution
  8. Checklist
  9. Anti-patterns
  10. Output format
  11. Supplementary resources
More from Awesome-Journal-Skills
All skills →
About this skill
What does the ylj-thesis-and-contribution skill do?

Use when sharpening the central legal-scholarly claim and contribution for a The Yale Law Journal (YLJ) piece. It forces a falsifiable, generalist thesis and names the contribution type; it does not search prior literature (use ylj-preemption-check) or build the argument (use ylj-argument-structure).

How do I install it?

Run `npx skills add brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills --skill ylj-thesis-and-contribution --agent claude-code` — it drops the skill into your project so the agent can pick it up. Swap the --agent value for codex, cursor or copilot if you use one of those.

Where does this skill come from?

From brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills, a repository with 984 stars. We read it straight from the repository tree rather than a submitted listing, so what you see here is what is actually published.

Is a popular skill a good skill?

Not necessarily. Stars measure attention, not adoption — a repository can trend for a week and be abandoned. That is why we show the weekly change from our own snapshots next to the total, instead of a single flattering number.

Keep going