aaai-review-process
Use when explaining or planning around AAAI's two-phase review process, Phase 1 rejection risk, Phase 2 additional reviews, AI-assisted review pilot, author feedback, SPC/AC discussion, and final decisions.
Profile →npx skills add brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills --skill aaai-review-process --agent claude-code
Same command for any agent — swap --agent for codex, cursor, copilot.
Weekly change comes from our own snapshots, not the repository page — it measures attention, not adoption.
# AAAI Review Process Use this to plan around AAAI review rather than treating it as a generic OpenReview rebuttal. Reopen the current review-process page and author FAQ before advising on timing or strategy. ## Process model - AAAI main technical track uses double-blind reviewing. - AAAI-26 used a two-phase review process. Phase 1 had human reviews and a non-decisional AI-generated review. Papers with sufficiently negative reviews could be rejected before author feedback. - Papers continuing to Phase 2 received additional reviews and one author feedback phase. - Final decisions were made through reviewer discussion and senior program committee oversight, not by the AI review. - Author feedback is short and constrained; it is mainly for correcting misunderstandings, not replacing the paper. ## Author strategy - Reduce Phase 1 reject risk before submission by making contribution, evidence, and checklist compliance obvious. - When reviews arrive, distinguish human-review claims, AI-review errors, and AC/SPC decision questions. - Use rebuttal to resolve the highest-impact factual issue under the character limit. - Do not attack the AI review. Correct it when it contains consequential
- Process model
- Author strategy
- Stage-by-stage decision map
- Why papers die in Phase 1
- Worked vignette
- Output format
What does the aaai-review-process skill do?
Use when explaining or planning around AAAI's two-phase review process, Phase 1 rejection risk, Phase 2 additional reviews, AI-assisted review pilot, author feedback, SPC/AC discussion, and final decisions.
How do I install it?
Run `npx skills add brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills --skill aaai-review-process --agent claude-code` — it drops the skill into your project so the agent can pick it up. Swap the --agent value for codex, cursor or copilot if you use one of those.
Where does this skill come from?
From brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills, a repository with 909 stars. We read it straight from the repository tree rather than a submitted listing, so what you see here is what is actually published.
Is a popular skill a good skill?
Not necessarily. Stars measure attention, not adoption — a repository can trend for a week and be abandoned. That is why we show the weekly change from our own snapshots next to the total, instead of a single flattering number.