Agent skill

wsdm-supplementary

Use when deciding what goes where in a WSDM submission whose appendices count inside the page cap - triage between the 9-page body, the uncounted references and ethics section, and the cited external repository; compression tactics for proofs, prompts, and hyperparameter tables under WSDM's historically tight budget.

brycew6m4,252★ · +31/wk · 3 repos on radarProfile →
claude-codeMIT
Install
npx skills add brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills --skill wsdm-supplementary --agent claude-code

Same command for any agent — swap --agent for codex, cursor, copilot.

Facts
Files in the skill folder: 1
SKILL.md size: 6 KB
Bundled scripts: none
Path: WSDM-Skills/skills/wsdm-supplementary/SKILL.md
Open the folder on GitHub →
Where it comes from
Stars: 984 · +31 this week
Language: Stata
Read our review of the source →

Weekly change comes from our own snapshots, not the repository page — it measures attention, not adoption.

From the SKILL.md

# WSDM Supplementary Material Allocate content across WSDM's three containers. The defining constraint, verified for the 2026 edition: **appendices are inside the 9-page cap**, and only references plus the required ethical-considerations section sit outside it (2025: 8 pages + at most 2 for references-plus-ethics). WSDM has kept a famously lean budget since its early editions, and no separate supplementary-upload channel was verified for current cycles (待核实 - if the current CFP adds one, re-plan around it). So "put it in the supplement" is not an available sentence here; the real containers are: | Container | Counted? | Reviewer obligation | Right contents | |---|---|---|---| | Body (≤9 pp incl. appendices, 2026) | Yes | Read | Claims, method, all decisive evidence | | References | No | Consulted | Complete citations - never compressed | | Ethics section | No | Read as ethics | Societal impact, privacy, misuse, mitigations | | Cited anonymous repository | No | Voluntary | Code, configs, raw results, full prompts, extra ablations | ## Triage rule: decisive vs supporting vs archival - **Decisive** evidence - anything a reviewer needs to believe a headline claim (main comparisons, the

What's inside
Steps it walks through
  1. Triage rule: decisive vs supporting vs archival
  2. Compression tactics that keep meaning
  3. The pointer pattern
  4. Budget worksheet
  5. Edge cases
  6. Output format
More from Awesome-Journal-Skills
All skills →
About this skill
What does the wsdm-supplementary skill do?

Use when deciding what goes where in a WSDM submission whose appendices count inside the page cap - triage between the 9-page body, the uncounted references and ethics section, and the cited external repository; compression tactics for proofs, prompts, and hyperparameter tables under WSDM's historically tight budget.

How do I install it?

Run `npx skills add brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills --skill wsdm-supplementary --agent claude-code` — it drops the skill into your project so the agent can pick it up. Swap the --agent value for codex, cursor or copilot if you use one of those.

Where does this skill come from?

From brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills, a repository with 984 stars. We read it straight from the repository tree rather than a submitted listing, so what you see here is what is actually published.

Is a popular skill a good skill?

Not necessarily. Stars measure attention, not adoption — a repository can trend for a week and be abandoned. That is why we show the weekly change from our own snapshots next to the total, instead of a single flattering number.

Keep going