Agent skill

wp-theory-building

Use when building the theoretical argument of a World Politics manuscript so it travels across cases. World Politics rewards arguments that significantly advance theoretical debates in comparative politics and international relations, with explicit mechanisms and scope conditions that generalize beyond one case. Structures the argument; it does not run analyses.

brycew6m4,252★ · +31/wk · 3 repos on radarProfile →
claude-codeMIT
Install
npx skills add brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills --skill wp-theory-building --agent claude-code

Same command for any agent — swap --agent for codex, cursor, copilot.

Facts
Files in the skill folder: 1
SKILL.md size: 6 KB
Bundled scripts: none
Path: World-Politics-Skills/skills/wp-theory-building/SKILL.md
Open the folder on GitHub →
Where it comes from
Stars: 984 · +31 this week
Language: Stata
Read our review of the source →

Weekly change comes from our own snapshots, not the repository page — it measures attention, not adoption.

From the SKILL.md

# Theory & Argument Building (wp-theory-building) At World Politics a finding is not a contribution until it is attached to **theory the field can carry to other cases.** The journal asks articles to "significantly advance theoretical debates" — so this skill turns case evidence into a portable argument: explicit mechanisms, scope conditions, and observable implications that hold across comparative or IR settings. ## When to trigger - The empirics are strong but the "so what / why it travels" is thin - A reviewer said the paper is "atheoretical," "ad hoc," or "just a single-case story" - You need to state mechanisms, assumptions, and scope conditions explicitly - Formal modeling: deciding what to model for a comparative/IR puzzle ## Build the argument (by mode of work) ### Empirical paper with a theory 1. **Concept** — define the key constructs precisely (regime type, institution, alliance, identity); distinguish from neighbors and travel-test the concept across cases (avoid concept stretching). 2. **Mechanism** — the causal story: who does what, under what incentives/constraints, in what institutional or international setting. 3. **Observable implications** — what we should see if

What's inside
Steps it walks through
  1. When to trigger
  2. Build the argument (by mode of work)
  3. Empirical paper with a theory
  4. Formal / game-theoretic paper
  5. The "travels" test (World Politics–specific)
  6. Anti-patterns
  7. Referee-pushback patterns and the venue-specific fix
  8. Worked micro-example (illustrative)
  9. Operating pass for World Politics
  10. Output format
  11. Supplementary resources
More from Awesome-Journal-Skills
All skills →
About this skill
What does the wp-theory-building skill do?

Use when building the theoretical argument of a World Politics manuscript so it travels across cases. World Politics rewards arguments that significantly advance theoretical debates in comparative politics and international relations, with explicit mechanisms and scope conditions that generalize beyond one case. Structures the argument; it does not run analyses.

How do I install it?

Run `npx skills add brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills --skill wp-theory-building --agent claude-code` — it drops the skill into your project so the agent can pick it up. Swap the --agent value for codex, cursor or copilot if you use one of those.

Where does this skill come from?

From brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills, a repository with 984 stars. We read it straight from the repository tree rather than a submitted listing, so what you see here is what is actually published.

Is a popular skill a good skill?

Not necessarily. Stars measure attention, not adoption — a repository can trend for a week and be abandoned. That is why we show the weekly change from our own snapshots next to the total, instead of a single flattering number.

Keep going