Agent skill

workflows:ideate

Divergent research ideation — generate many candidate directions, then adversarially filter to the strongest

brycew6m4,252★ · +31/wk · 3 repos on radarProfile →
claude-codecan modify filesNOASSERTION
Install
npx skills add brycewang-stanford/Auto-Empirical-Research-Skills --skill workflows-ideate --agent claude-code

Same command for any agent — swap --agent for codex, cursor, copilot.

Facts
Files in the skill folder: 1
SKILL.md size: 3 KB
Bundled scripts: none
Allowed tools: ReadGlobBash
Path: skills/11-James-Traina-compound-science/skills/workflows-ideate/SKILL.md
Open the folder on GitHub →
Where it comes from
Stars: 3,244
Language: Stata
Read our review of the source →

Weekly change comes from our own snapshots, not the repository page — it measures attention, not adoption.

From the SKILL.md

# Research Ideation Divergent exploration before convergent brainstorming. Generate many candidates, then filter ruthlessly. ## Phase 0: Scope the Ideation Read $ARGUMENTS. If the user provides a specific research question, ideate around it. If they provide a broad topic, explore broadly. ## Phase 1: Generate Candidates (Divergent) Generate 15-20 candidate research directions. Use these research-adapted ideation frames: 1. **Identification weakness** — What existing results have weak identification? What new variation could fix it? 2. **Computational bottleneck** — What problems are infeasible with current methods but tractable with new estimators or hardware? 3. **Data limitation workaround** — What would become possible with data that is now available but underexploited? 4. **Alternative estimator class** — What if the standard approach (e.g., linear IV) were replaced with a different class (e.g., ML, structural, Bayesian)? 5. **Relaxed assumption** — What results depend on assumptions that could be relaxed? What happens when you relax them? 6. **Literature gap** — What do practitioners need that academics haven't provided? What do adjacent fields know that this field doesn't? Di

What's inside
Steps it walks through
  1. Phase 0: Scope the Ideation
  2. Phase 1: Generate Candidates (Divergent)
  3. Phase 2: Adversarial Filter (Convergent)
  4. Phase 3: Output
  5. Handoff
More from Auto-Empirical-Research-Skills
All skills →
About this skill
What does the workflows:ideate skill do?

Divergent research ideation — generate many candidate directions, then adversarially filter to the strongest

How do I install it?

Run `npx skills add brycewang-stanford/Auto-Empirical-Research-Skills --skill workflows-ideate --agent claude-code` — it drops the skill into your project so the agent can pick it up. Swap the --agent value for codex, cursor or copilot if you use one of those.

Where does this skill come from?

From brycewang-stanford/Auto-Empirical-Research-Skills, a repository with 3,244 stars. We read it straight from the repository tree rather than a submitted listing, so what you see here is what is actually published.

Is a popular skill a good skill?

Not necessarily. Stars measure attention, not adoption — a repository can trend for a week and be abandoned. That is why we show the weekly change from our own snapshots next to the total, instead of a single flattering number.

Keep going