wacv-supplementary
Use when organizing WACV supplementary material, covering what belongs in the anonymized supplement versus the 8-page body, packaging qualitative videos and extra results without breaking double-blind, keeping the supplement consistent with the paper across the two-round revision, and honoring WACV's no-author-identifying-links rule.
Profile →npx skills add brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills --skill wacv-supplementary --agent claude-code
Same command for any agent — swap --agent for codex, cursor, copilot.
Weekly change comes from our own snapshots, not the repository page — it measures attention, not adoption.
# WACV Supplementary Use this to decide what leaves the 8-page body for the supplement and how to package it without leaking identity. WACV's applications work is often visual and systems-heavy, so the supplement carries videos and protocol detail — and the two-round model means it must stay consistent with the paper across a revision. Facts are the WACV 2026/2027 cycles as read on 2026-07-09. ## Body vs supplement split The **8-page body including figures and tables** holds the argument; the supplement holds the evidence a reviewer consults to verify it. Keep the body self-sufficient — a reviewer must be able to follow the contribution without opening the supplement — and push depth down: | Keep in the 8-page body | Move to the supplement | |---|---| | The contribution, the constraint, the headline comparison | Full protocol: splits, devices, meters, hyperparameters | | One teaser + the decisive qualitative and quantitative results | Extra qualitative grids and per-class breakdowns | | The claim → evidence pairing | Video demonstrations of the deployed system | | The core ablation | Additional ablations and sensitivity studies | | A short proof sketch (if any) | Full derivations |
- Body vs supplement split
- Anonymity is the hard constraint
- Package it as evidence, not a dump
- Consistency across the two rounds
- Reverify each cycle
- Output format
What does the wacv-supplementary skill do?
Use when organizing WACV supplementary material, covering what belongs in the anonymized supplement versus the 8-page body, packaging qualitative videos and extra results without breaking double-blind, keeping the supplement consistent with the paper across the two-round revision, and honoring WACV's no-author-identifying-links rule.
How do I install it?
Run `npx skills add brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills --skill wacv-supplementary --agent claude-code` — it drops the skill into your project so the agent can pick it up. Swap the --agent value for codex, cursor or copilot if you use one of those.
Where does this skill come from?
From brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills, a repository with 984 stars. We read it straight from the repository tree rather than a submitted listing, so what you see here is what is actually published.
Is a popular skill a good skill?
Not necessarily. Stars measure attention, not adoption — a repository can trend for a week and be abandoned. That is why we show the weekly change from our own snapshots next to the total, instead of a single flattering number.