Agent skill

stoc-related-work

Use when positioning a STOC (ACM Symposium on Theory of Computing) paper against the theory literature — tracing bound-improvement lineages, citing conference/journal/preprint version pairs correctly, handling concurrent arXiv and ECCC work, and keeping self-citation double-blind-safe.

brycew6m4,252★ · +31/wk · 3 repos on radarProfile →
claude-codeMIT
Install
npx skills add brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills --skill stoc-related-work --agent claude-code

Same command for any agent — swap --agent for codex, cursor, copilot.

Facts
Files in the skill folder: 1
SKILL.md size: 6 KB
Bundled scripts: none
Path: STOC-Skills/skills/stoc-related-work/SKILL.md
Open the folder on GitHub →
Where it comes from
Stars: 984 · +31 this week
Language: Stata
Read our review of the source →

Weekly change comes from our own snapshots, not the repository page — it measures attention, not adoption.

From the SKILL.md

# STOC Related Work Theory positioning is quantitative: reviewers expect the paper to place its bounds in an explicit lineage ("[A] gave $O(n^2)$; [B] improved to $O(n \log n)$ under assumption X; we remove X and reach $O(n)$"), and they check the lineage against their own memory of it. Errors here — a missed improvement, a misquoted exponent, a result attributed to the journal version's year instead of the conference announcement — are among the fastest credibility losses available at this venue. ## The lanes a STOC reviewer checks | Lane | What must be covered | Typical miss | |---|---|---| | The direct lineage | Every prior bound on your exact problem, with its model | Quoting the weakest prior bound to inflate the delta | | The barrier literature | Known obstructions your result confronts (relativization, natural proofs, hardness reductions, integrality gaps) | Claiming a breakthrough while silent on why the barrier does not apply | | Neighboring models | The same question in weaker/stronger models (randomized vs. deterministic, static vs. dynamic, classical vs. quantum) | "First" claims that are only first in one cell of the model grid | | Technique ancestry | Where your machi

What's inside
Steps it walks through
  1. The lanes a STOC reviewer checks
  2. Version-aware citation, a theory-specific craft
  3. Concurrent and independent work
  4. Double-blind self-positioning
  5. Building the comparison honestly
  6. The deadline-week sweep, as a procedure
  7. Cycle-volatility warnings
  8. Output format
More from Awesome-Journal-Skills
All skills →
About this skill
What does the stoc-related-work skill do?

Use when positioning a STOC (ACM Symposium on Theory of Computing) paper against the theory literature — tracing bound-improvement lineages, citing conference/journal/preprint version pairs correctly, handling concurrent arXiv and ECCC work, and keeping self-citation double-blind-safe.

How do I install it?

Run `npx skills add brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills --skill stoc-related-work --agent claude-code` — it drops the skill into your project so the agent can pick it up. Swap the --agent value for codex, cursor or copilot if you use one of those.

Where does this skill come from?

From brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills, a repository with 984 stars. We read it straight from the repository tree rather than a submitted listing, so what you see here is what is actually published.

Is a popular skill a good skill?

Not necessarily. Stars measure attention, not adoption — a repository can trend for a week and be abandoned. That is why we show the weekly change from our own snapshots next to the total, instead of a single flattering number.

Keep going