sigmetrics-supplementary
Use when deciding what belongs in an ACM SIGMETRICS paper body versus its appendices and anonymized artifact, covering the 20-page single-column acmsmall budget, the rule that decision-critical claims (theorem statements, assumptions, headline validation) stay inside the reviewed pages, full proofs in appendices, double-anonymous supplementary material, and how to split a proof-plus-measurement paper.
Profile →npx skills add brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills --skill sigmetrics-supplementary --agent claude-code
Same command for any agent — swap --agent for codex, cursor, copilot.
Weekly change comes from our own snapshots, not the repository page — it measures attention, not adoption.
# SIGMETRICS Supplementary Use this when assembling SIGMETRICS supplementary material. The governing rule is simple and strict: **the paper must be judgeable from the reviewed pages alone.** Appendices and the artifact support the paper; they do not hold the argument. Reviewers read the artifact at their discretion, so anything the decision depends on — the theorem statements, their assumptions, and the headline validation — lives in the body. ## What goes where | Content | Body (within the 20-page budget) | Appendix / artifact | |---|---|---| | Theorem/bound statements and their assumptions | Yes | — | | Full proofs | The statement + key idea | Full derivations (appendix) | | The model and why its assumptions are plausible | Yes | Extended sensitivity analysis | | The headline analysis-vs-measurement validation | Yes | Full simulation sweeps, extra distributions | | Baselines and the main comparison | Yes | Full parameter grids, per-workload tables | | Simulator, trace-processing scripts, seeds | — | Yes (anonymized) | | Trace/dataset itself | Summary + provenance | The processed dataset (or documented access) | If a reviewer would need to open the artifact (or dig into an appendi
- What goes where
- The page-budget discipline
- Double-anonymous supplementary rules
- Appendix architecture
- Vignette: splitting a proof-plus-measurement paper
- Output format
What does the sigmetrics-supplementary skill do?
Use when deciding what belongs in an ACM SIGMETRICS paper body versus its appendices and anonymized artifact, covering the 20-page single-column acmsmall budget, the rule that decision-critical claims (theorem statements, assumptions, headline validation) stay inside the reviewed pages, full proofs in appendices, double-anonymous supplementary material, and how to split a proof-plus-measurement paper.
How do I install it?
Run `npx skills add brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills --skill sigmetrics-supplementary --agent claude-code` — it drops the skill into your project so the agent can pick it up. Swap the --agent value for codex, cursor or copilot if you use one of those.
Where does this skill come from?
From brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills, a repository with 984 stars. We read it straight from the repository tree rather than a submitted listing, so what you see here is what is actually published.
Is a popular skill a good skill?
Not necessarily. Stars measure attention, not adoption — a repository can trend for a week and be abandoned. That is why we show the weekly change from our own snapshots next to the total, instead of a single flattering number.