Agent skill

sensys-topic-selection

Use when deciding whether a project belongs at SenSys after the 2026 merger absorbed IPSN and IoTDI — testing whether the contribution is a built, measured sensing/embedded/IoT/on-device-AI system rather than a pure algorithm, a mobile-networking mechanism, or an offline ML result, and routing misfits to MobiCom, MobiSys, or an ML/DSP venue.

brycew6m4,252★ · +31/wk · 3 repos on radarProfile →
claude-codeMIT
Install
npx skills add brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills --skill sensys-topic-selection --agent claude-code

Same command for any agent — swap --agent for codex, cursor, copilot.

Facts
Files in the skill folder: 1
SKILL.md size: 5 KB
Bundled scripts: none
Path: SenSys-Skills/skills/sensys-topic-selection/SKILL.md
Open the folder on GitHub →
Where it comes from
Stars: 984 · +31 this week
Language: Stata
Read our review of the source →

Weekly change comes from our own snapshots, not the repository page — it measures attention, not adoption.

From the SKILL.md

# SenSys Topic Selection SenSys accepts a **system you built and measured under embedded constraints**. The 2026 merger of SenSys, IPSN, and IoTDI widened the mandate — low-power networked sensing, embedded systems, IoT, and on-device AI now share one venue — but it did not soften the systems bar: a strong SenSys paper still has a **buildable mechanism** whose value is shown in **energy, latency, memory, and deployment behavior on real hardware**, not in a proof or a leaderboard delta. ## The fit test Ask these in order; a "no" is a routing signal, not a verdict on the work's quality. 1. **Is there a system?** Can you point to the artifact — firmware, a node, a protocol, a deployment — that embodies the contribution? A pure algorithm with no embedded realization is a signal-processing or ML contribution. 2. **Do embedded constraints bind?** Does energy, memory, compute, bandwidth, or intermittent power actually shape the design? If the method would run unchanged on a workstation, the constraint is not doing work and SenSys is a weak fit. 3. **Is the evidence physical?** Are the headline numbers **measured on hardware** — current draw, duty cycle, on-device latency, deployment uptim

What's inside
Steps it walks through
  1. The fit test
  2. Routing table
  3. Post-merger boundary calls
  4. When two venues both fit
  5. Output format
More from Awesome-Journal-Skills
All skills →
About this skill
What does the sensys-topic-selection skill do?

Use when deciding whether a project belongs at SenSys after the 2026 merger absorbed IPSN and IoTDI — testing whether the contribution is a built, measured sensing/embedded/IoT/on-device-AI system rather than a pure algorithm, a mobile-networking mechanism, or an offline ML result, and routing misfits to MobiCom, MobiSys, or an ML/DSP venue.

How do I install it?

Run `npx skills add brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills --skill sensys-topic-selection --agent claude-code` — it drops the skill into your project so the agent can pick it up. Swap the --agent value for codex, cursor or copilot if you use one of those.

Where does this skill come from?

From brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills, a repository with 984 stars. We read it straight from the repository tree rather than a submitted listing, so what you see here is what is actually published.

Is a popular skill a good skill?

Not necessarily. Stars measure attention, not adoption — a repository can trend for a week and be abandoned. That is why we show the weekly change from our own snapshots next to the total, instead of a single flattering number.

Keep going