bio-copy-number-recurrent-cnv
Identify recurrent and driver copy number alterations across a tumor cohort with GISTIC2 (G-score, Ziggurat deconstruction, focal vs broad/arm-level analysis, q-values from permutation) and quantify copy-number signatures with the Steele 2022 COSMIC framework and the Drews 2022 CINSignatures framework. Covers driver-gene localization from recurrence peaks, distinguishing focal drivers from arm-level passengers, and the caller-sensitivity caveats of copy-number signatures. Use when finding recurrently amplified or deleted regions in a cohort, localizing driver genes, separating focal from broad
npx skills add BioTender-max/awesome-bio-agent-skills --skill recurrent-cnv --agent claude-code
Same command for any agent — swap --agent for codex, cursor, copilot.
Weekly change comes from our own snapshots, not the repository page — it measures attention, not adoption.
## Version Compatibility Reference examples tested with: GISTIC 2.0.23, R 4.3+ with CINSignatureQuantification 1.2+; Python 3.10+ with SigProfilerAssignment 0.1+ (optional, COSMIC CN signatures). Before using code patterns, verify installed versions match. If versions differ: - CLI: `gistic2 --help` (GISTIC 2.0 is a MATLAB-compiled binary; needs the MCR runtime) - R: `packageVersion('CINSignatureQuantification')` - Python: `pip show SigProfilerAssignment` GISTIC 2.0 has had no substantive release since ~2017; it is effectively frozen. It runs as a compiled binary against the MATLAB Compiler Runtime — there is no R or Python package. Verify the reference (`-refgene`) `.mat` file matches the genome build. # Recurrent and Driver Copy Number Alteration **"Which copy number changes recur across my cohort, and which gene is the driver"** -> A CNV in one tumor is an observation; a CNV recurring across many tumors beyond chance is evidence of selection. GISTIC2 separates recurrent driver events from passengers by modeling a background rate and scoring each locus by how often, and how strongly, it is altered. Copy-number signatures decompose the genome-wide pattern of alterations into the m
- Version Compatibility
- How GISTIC2 Works — and Its Limits
- Decision Tree
- Running GISTIC2
- Copy-Number Signatures
- Failure Modes
- Comparing q-values across cohorts of different size
- Oversegmented input produces spurious peaks
- Mis-centered seg file inverts everything
- Treating a wide GISTIC peak as a single-gene call
- Copy-number signatures from relative copy number
- Reconciliation
- Quantitative Thresholds
- Common Errors
Segment file: 6 columns -- sample, chrom, start, end, num_markers, seg.mean (log2). It MUST be diploid-centered. Pool per-sample segments (e.g. cnvkit.py export seg). gistic2 \
What does the bio-copy-number-recurrent-cnv skill do?
Identify recurrent and driver copy number alterations across a tumor cohort with GISTIC2 (G-score, Ziggurat deconstruction, focal vs broad/arm-level analysis, q-values from permutation) and quantify copy-number signatures with the Steele 2022 COSMIC framework and the Drews 2022 CINSignatures framework. Covers driver-gene localization from recurrence peaks, distinguishing focal drivers from arm-level passengers, and the caller-sensitivity caveats of copy-number signatures. Use when finding recurrently amplified or deleted regions in a cohort, localizing driver genes, separating focal from broad
How do I install it?
Run `npx skills add BioTender-max/awesome-bio-agent-skills --skill recurrent-cnv --agent claude-code` — it drops the skill into your project so the agent can pick it up. Swap the --agent value for codex, cursor or copilot if you use one of those.
Where does this skill come from?
From BioTender-max/awesome-bio-agent-skills, a repository with 135 stars. We read it straight from the repository tree rather than a submitted listing, so what you see here is what is actually published.
Is a popular skill a good skill?
Not necessarily. Stars measure attention, not adoption — a repository can trend for a week and be abandoned. That is why we show the weekly change from our own snapshots next to the total, instead of a single flattering number.
