Agent skill

pnas-significance

Use to write the mandatory PNAS Significance Statement — ≤120 words, written so an educated reader outside the field (down to an undergraduate) understands why the work matters. Distinct from the abstract. The highest-value PNAS-specific artifact.

brycew6m4,252★ · +31/wk · 3 repos on radarProfile →
claude-codeMIT
Install
npx skills add brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills --skill pnas-significance --agent claude-code

Same command for any agent — swap --agent for codex, cursor, copilot.

Facts
Files in the skill folder: 1
SKILL.md size: 5 KB
Bundled scripts: none
Path: PNAS-Skills/skills/pnas-significance/SKILL.md
Open the folder on GitHub →
Where it comes from
Stars: 984 · +31 this week
Language: Stata
Read our review of the source →

Weekly change comes from our own snapshots, not the repository page — it measures attention, not adoption.

From the SKILL.md

# Significance Statement (pnas-significance) ## Why this is a flagship PNAS skill Every PNAS research article must include a **Significance Statement** — a short, mandatory, separately submitted paragraph that explains, in plain language, **why the work matters to science and society**. It appears prominently with the article and is read by editors at triage and by the broad readership. It is **not** a second abstract. Getting it right is one of the highest-leverage things you can do for a PNAS submission, so draft it as soon as the central claim is locked — do not leave it to the final upload. ## When to trigger - The submission has no Significance Statement. - The Significance Statement just restates or condenses the abstract. - It is dense with jargon and undefined acronyms. - It exceeds ~120 words. ## The hard rule: ≤120 words, written for a non-specialist - **Length:** **≤ 120 words** (confirm the exact cap in current PNAS author guidelines; treat 120 as the ceiling). - **Audience:** an **educated scientist outside your field — down to a bright undergraduate**. If a chemistry undergraduate or a non-specialist colleague cannot follow it, rewrite it. - **Test:** read it aloud to

What's inside
Steps it walks through
  1. Why this is a flagship PNAS skill
  2. When to trigger
  3. The hard rule: ≤120 words, written for a non-specialist
  4. What it must do (and not do)
  5. Template (four short moves, no headings)
  6. Worked shape
  7. The undergraduate rewrite drill
  8. Common failures (rewrite on sight)
  9. Output format
  10. Anti-patterns
More from Awesome-Journal-Skills
All skills →
About this skill
What does the pnas-significance skill do?

Use to write the mandatory PNAS Significance Statement — ≤120 words, written so an educated reader outside the field (down to an undergraduate) understands why the work matters. Distinct from the abstract. The highest-value PNAS-specific artifact.

How do I install it?

Run `npx skills add brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills --skill pnas-significance --agent claude-code` — it drops the skill into your project so the agent can pick it up. Swap the --agent value for codex, cursor or copilot if you use one of those.

Where does this skill come from?

From brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills, a repository with 984 stars. We read it straight from the repository tree rather than a submitted listing, so what you see here is what is actually published.

Is a popular skill a good skill?

Not necessarily. Stars measure attention, not adoption — a repository can trend for a week and be abandoned. That is why we show the weekly change from our own snapshots next to the total, instead of a single flattering number.

Keep going