Agent skill

philosophy-research-guide

Research methods and analytical frameworks for philosophical inquiry and scho...

brycew6m4,252★ · +31/wk · 3 repos on radarProfile →
claude-codeNOASSERTION
Install
npx skills add brycewang-stanford/Auto-Empirical-Research-Skills --skill philosophy-research-guide --agent claude-code

Same command for any agent — swap --agent for codex, cursor, copilot.

Facts
Files in the skill folder: 1
SKILL.md size: 5 KB
Bundled scripts: none
Path: skills/43-wentorai-research-plugins/skills/domains/humanities/philosophy-research-guide/SKILL.md
Open the folder on GitHub →
Where it comes from
Stars: 3,244
Language: Stata
Read our review of the source →

Weekly change comes from our own snapshots, not the repository page — it measures attention, not adoption.

From the SKILL.md

# Philosophy Research Guide A skill for conducting rigorous philosophical research, from constructing arguments and analyzing texts to writing publishable philosophy papers. Covers major subfields, argumentation methods, and the distinctive methodology of philosophical inquiry. ## Philosophical Argumentation ### Argument Structure and Evaluation Every philosophical argument can be reconstructed in standard form: ``` Premise 1: All knowledge requires justification. (epistemic principle) Premise 2: Sensory experience alone cannot provide certainty. (empirical claim) Premise 3: If knowledge requires certainty, then sensory experience is insufficient for knowledge. (conditional from P1, P2) Conclusion: Therefore, knowledge requires something beyond sensory experience. (from P1, P2, P3 by modus ponens) ``` ### Validity and Soundness Checks ```python def evaluate_argument(premises: list[str], conclusion: str, premises_true: list[bool], valid: bool) -> dict: """ Evaluate an argument's logical properties. An argument is: - Valid: if the conclusion follows necessarily from the premises - Sound: if it is valid AND all premises are true - Cogent (inductive): if premises make conclusion probab

What's inside
Steps it walks through
  1. Philosophical Argumentation
  2. Argument Structure and Evaluation
  3. Validity and Soundness Checks
  4. Common Logical Fallacies
  5. Research Methods by Subfield
  6. Epistemology
  7. Ethics and Applied Ethics
  8. History of Philosophy
  9. Writing Philosophy Papers
  10. Paper Structure
  11. Citation Practices
  12. Key Databases
More from Auto-Empirical-Research-Skills
All skills →
About this skill
What does the philosophy-research-guide skill do?

Research methods and analytical frameworks for philosophical inquiry and scho...

How do I install it?

Run `npx skills add brycewang-stanford/Auto-Empirical-Research-Skills --skill philosophy-research-guide --agent claude-code` — it drops the skill into your project so the agent can pick it up. Swap the --agent value for codex, cursor or copilot if you use one of those.

Where does this skill come from?

From brycewang-stanford/Auto-Empirical-Research-Skills, a repository with 3,244 stars. We read it straight from the repository tree rather than a submitted listing, so what you see here is what is actually published.

Is a popular skill a good skill?

Not necessarily. Stars measure attention, not adoption — a repository can trend for a week and be abandoned. That is why we show the weekly change from our own snapshots next to the total, instead of a single flattering number.

Keep going