Agent skill

philosophy-and-public-affairs

Use when targeting Philosophy & Public Affairs or deciding whether an applied/political-moral philosophy manuscript on a matter of public concern fits this venue. Encodes the journal's fit, the rigorous-argument and public-significance bar, dialectical-engagement expectations, house style and double-blind norms, official-submission re-check, and desk-reject heuristics.

brycew6m4,252★ · +31/wk · 3 repos on radarProfile →
claude-codeMIT
Install
npx skills add brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills --skill philosophy-and-public-affairs --agent claude-code

Same command for any agent — swap --agent for codex, cursor, copilot.

Facts
Files in the skill folder: 1
SKILL.md size: 7 KB
Bundled scripts: none
Path: English-Humanities-Journal-Skills/skills/philosophy-and-public-affairs/SKILL.md
Open the folder on GitHub →
Where it comes from
Stars: 984 · +31 this week
Language: Stata
Read our review of the source →

Weekly change comes from our own snapshots, not the repository page — it measures attention, not adoption.

From the SKILL.md

# Philosophy & Public Affairs (philosophy-and-public-affairs) ## Journal positioning Philosophy & Public Affairs, published by Wiley, brings philosophical rigor to **matters of public concern** — justice, rights, equality, war and its ethics, democracy, immigration, bioethics, the environment, and questions of policy. Its defining expectation is a **rigorous, original argument** that genuinely bears on a problem people outside academic philosophy care about: a clearly stated thesis, a valid and carefully defended line of reasoning, and head-on engagement with the strongest opposing positions, while remaining tethered to the real practical or political question. It is the applied/political-moral counterpart to Ethics, which ranges more widely into moral theory and metaethics; choose between them by whether the center of gravity is a public-affairs problem or a question of moral theory. Abstract theory with no public stake, or opinion with no argument, is a poor fit. This skill is a **fit / venue-selection / re-framing** aid. It does not replace the journal's current submission guidelines. Before submitting, re-check the live Philosophy & Public Affairs author instructions. ## When t

What's inside
Steps it walks through
  1. Journal positioning
  2. When to trigger
  3. Scope & topic fit
  4. Method & evidence bar
  5. Structure & house style
  6. Official-submission checklist
  7. Pre-submission self-check
  8. Common desk-reject triggers
  9. Re-routing decision
  10. Output format
More from Awesome-Journal-Skills
All skills →
About this skill
What does the philosophy-and-public-affairs skill do?

Use when targeting Philosophy & Public Affairs or deciding whether an applied/political-moral philosophy manuscript on a matter of public concern fits this venue. Encodes the journal's fit, the rigorous-argument and public-significance bar, dialectical-engagement expectations, house style and double-blind norms, official-submission re-check, and desk-reject heuristics.

How do I install it?

Run `npx skills add brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills --skill philosophy-and-public-affairs --agent claude-code` — it drops the skill into your project so the agent can pick it up. Swap the --agent value for codex, cursor or copilot if you use one of those.

Where does this skill come from?

From brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills, a repository with 984 stars. We read it straight from the repository tree rather than a submitted listing, so what you see here is what is actually published.

Is a popular skill a good skill?

Not necessarily. Stars measure attention, not adoption — a repository can trend for a week and be abandoned. That is why we show the weekly change from our own snapshots next to the total, instead of a single flattering number.

Keep going