Agent skill

nsdi-related-work

Use when positioning an NSDI submission against the networked-systems literature — covering the NSDI/SIGCOMM/OSDI/SOSP lanes plus both accepted-paper cohorts of the current edition, verifying venues against dblp and open-access USENIX proceedings, and handling self-citations and concurrent submissions under double-blind rules.

brycew6m4,252★ · +31/wk · 3 repos on radarProfile →
claude-codeMIT
Install
npx skills add brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills --skill nsdi-related-work --agent claude-code

Same command for any agent — swap --agent for codex, cursor, copilot.

Facts
Files in the skill folder: 1
SKILL.md size: 7 KB
Bundled scripts: none
Path: NSDI-Skills/skills/nsdi-related-work/SKILL.md
Open the folder on GitHub →
Where it comes from
Stars: 984 · +31 this week
Language: Stata
Read our review of the source →

Weekly change comes from our own snapshots, not the repository page — it measures attention, not adoption.

From the SKILL.md

# NSDI Related Work Related work at NSDI answers one reviewer question: *what does this design let us do that the systems we already have do not?* Coverage gaps read as either ignorance or evasion, and the venue's open-access record removes every excuse for both. ## The lanes an NSDI reviewer expects swept | Lane | Where it lives | What must be said about it | |---|---|---| | Direct competitors | NSDI, SIGCOMM, OSDI, SOSP | Mechanism-level delta, ideally measured head-to-head | | Same problem, other stack layer | SIGCOMM (protocol), OSDI/SOSP (host), FAST (storage) | Why this layer is the right place to solve it | | Same technique, other domain | broad systems + ML-systems venues | What the networked setting breaks or changes | | Measurement/characterization basis | IMC, NSDI measurement papers | Which observed phenomena motivated the design | | Deployed/industrial precedent | operational-track papers, provider tech reports | What production experience the design inherits or contradicts | | Early/idea-stage neighbors | HotNets, frontiers-track papers | That the idea's grown-up form differs from the sketch | Both **cohorts of the current edition** count as literature: NSDI posts spr

What's inside
Steps it walks through
  1. The lanes an NSDI reviewer expects swept
  2. Verification: the venue must be proven
  3. Positioning moves that work at this venue
  4. Double-blind mechanics for citations
  5. Sequencing the sweep across the two-deadline year
  6. Failure patterns
  7. Where the section lives
  8. Output format
Commands it runs
Cross-check claimed venues in the .bib against dblp keys / USENIX URLs
grep -E '^@' paper.bib | wc -l                       # inventory
grep -A3 -iE 'booktitle.*(nsdi|sigcomm|osdi|sosp)' paper.bib | head -40
For each NSDI claim: the usenix.org/conference/nsdi<yy>/presentation/<key>
page or the dblp record must exist. No render, no citation-as-NSDI.
More from Awesome-Journal-Skills
All skills →
About this skill
What does the nsdi-related-work skill do?

Use when positioning an NSDI submission against the networked-systems literature — covering the NSDI/SIGCOMM/OSDI/SOSP lanes plus both accepted-paper cohorts of the current edition, verifying venues against dblp and open-access USENIX proceedings, and handling self-citations and concurrent submissions under double-blind rules.

How do I install it?

Run `npx skills add brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills --skill nsdi-related-work --agent claude-code` — it drops the skill into your project so the agent can pick it up. Swap the --agent value for codex, cursor or copilot if you use one of those.

Where does this skill come from?

From brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills, a repository with 984 stars. We read it straight from the repository tree rather than a submitted listing, so what you see here is what is actually published.

Is a popular skill a good skill?

Not necessarily. Stars measure attention, not adoption — a repository can trend for a week and be abandoned. That is why we show the weekly change from our own snapshots next to the total, instead of a single flattering number.

Keep going