Agent skill

msom-rebuttal

Use after a Manufacturing & Service Operations Management (M&SOM) revise-and-resubmit — planning the revision around the Department Editor and Associate Editor priorities, then drafting a point-by-point response to referees while preserving operations centrality, the structured abstract, and the 32-page typeset cap. Drives the revision; revise the manuscript before drafting the letter.

brycew6m4,252★ · +31/wk · 3 repos on radarProfile →
claude-codeMIT
Install
npx skills add brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills --skill msom-rebuttal --agent claude-code

Same command for any agent — swap --agent for codex, cursor, copilot.

Facts
Files in the skill folder: 1
SKILL.md size: 6 KB
Bundled scripts: none
Path: Manufacturing-and-Service-Operations-Management-Skills/skills/msom-rebuttal/SKILL.md
Open the folder on GitHub →
Where it comes from
Stars: 984 · +31 this week
Language: Stata
Read our review of the source →

Weekly change comes from our own snapshots, not the repository page — it measures attention, not adoption.

From the SKILL.md

# R&R Rebuttal (msom-rebuttal) ## When to trigger - You received an M&SOM major/minor revision and must plan the response - Referees ask for additional numerical studies, robustness, or identification work - The DE/AE flag operations centrality, tractability, or managerial relevance - You are drafting the point-by-point response letter ## Revise first, then write the letter Plan from the **Department Editor and Associate Editor** signals first — in M&SOM's department-routed model, their priorities are the binding contract; referee points must each be **addressed or carefully rebutted**. Do the actual modeling/analysis work before writing prose: add the proposition, run the requested numerical study, strengthen the identification. Then write a response that maps each comment to a concrete change. ## Common M&SOM revision demands - **Analytical:** generalize or relax a binding assumption and show the policy structure survives (or characterize when it does not); add comparative statics; expand the **numerical study** to quantify magnitudes versus benchmarks and stress assumptions; move heavy proofs to the **≤16-page supplement**. - **Empirical:** shore up identification (additional in

What's inside
Steps it walks through
  1. When to trigger
  2. Revise first, then write the letter
  3. Common M&SOM revision demands
  4. Watch the constraints while revising
  5. The response letter
  6. Checklist
  7. Anti-patterns
  8. Triaging the decision letter (priority before prose)
  9. Worked micro-example (illustrative)
  10. Referee-pushback patterns and the venue fix
  11. Output format
More from Awesome-Journal-Skills
All skills →
About this skill
What does the msom-rebuttal skill do?

Use after a Manufacturing & Service Operations Management (M&SOM) revise-and-resubmit — planning the revision around the Department Editor and Associate Editor priorities, then drafting a point-by-point response to referees while preserving operations centrality, the structured abstract, and the 32-page typeset cap. Drives the revision; revise the manuscript before drafting the letter.

How do I install it?

Run `npx skills add brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills --skill msom-rebuttal --agent claude-code` — it drops the skill into your project so the agent can pick it up. Swap the --agent value for codex, cursor or copilot if you use one of those.

Where does this skill come from?

From brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills, a repository with 984 stars. We read it straight from the repository tree rather than a submitted listing, so what you see here is what is actually published.

Is a popular skill a good skill?

Not necessarily. Stars measure attention, not adoption — a repository can trend for a week and be abandoned. That is why we show the weekly change from our own snapshots next to the total, instead of a single flattering number.

Keep going