Agent skill · Code Review & Quality

manuscript-review-council

Run a multi-agent scientific manuscript review with parallel specialist reviewers, disagreement checks, and an editor meta-review. Use when reviewing a manuscript, preprint, revision, or rebuttal in Codex or Claude Code.

BioTender-maxgithub.com/BioTender-maxGitHub ↗
claude-codeNOASSERTION
Install
npx skills add BioTender-max/awesome-bio-agent-skills --skill manuscript-review-council --agent claude-code

Same command for any agent — swap --agent for codex, cursor, copilot.

Facts
Files in the skill folder: 5
SKILL.md size: 8 KB
Bundled scripts: none
Path: skills/omics/manuscript-review-council/SKILL.md
Open the folder on GitHub →
Where it comes from
Stars: 135
Language: Python

Weekly change comes from our own snapshots, not the repository page — it measures attention, not adoption.

From the SKILL.md

# Manuscript Review Council Run a journal-style review council instead of a single blended opinion. This skill is self-contained and works in both Codex and Claude Code. The council definition lives in local files: - role roster: `references/reviewer-roles.md` - workflow and artifact bundle: `references/council-workflow.md` - per-reviewer handoff template: `templates/reviewer-brief.md` - editor synthesis template: `templates/editor-meta-review.md` ## Instructions 1. Confirm the review context: manuscript or revision stage, target venue if known, desired decision scale, and whether the user wants a full review, triage, version comparison, or rebuttal assessment. 2. Gather the review packet before delegating: - manuscript text or accessible PDF/DOCX - title, abstract, main claims, methods snapshot, and figure or table list - user priorities such as novelty, rigor, statistics, reproducibility, or journal fit - prior reviews or author response if this is a revision 3. Normalize the manuscript into a shared packet for every reviewer. At minimum, preserve section boundaries, figure references, and the claims being evaluated. If the source is a PDF or DOCX, extract a sectioned text view b

What's inside
Steps it walks through
  1. Instructions
  2. Quick Reference
  3. Input Requirements
  4. Output
  5. Quality Gates
  6. Examples
  7. Example 1: Full journal-style review
  8. Example 2: Revision comparison
  9. Example 3: Fast triage
  10. Troubleshooting
  11. Related Skills
Ships with 4 files
  • references/council-workflow.md
  • references/reviewer-roles.md
  • templates/editor-meta-review.md
  • templates/reviewer-brief.md
More from awesome-bio-agent-skills
All skills →
About this skill
What does the manuscript-review-council skill do?

Run a multi-agent scientific manuscript review with parallel specialist reviewers, disagreement checks, and an editor meta-review. Use when reviewing a manuscript, preprint, revision, or rebuttal in Codex or Claude Code.

How do I install it?

Run `npx skills add BioTender-max/awesome-bio-agent-skills --skill manuscript-review-council --agent claude-code` — it drops the skill into your project so the agent can pick it up. Swap the --agent value for codex, cursor or copilot if you use one of those.

Where does this skill come from?

From BioTender-max/awesome-bio-agent-skills, a repository with 135 stars. We read it straight from the repository tree rather than a submitted listing, so what you see here is what is actually published.

Is a popular skill a good skill?

Not necessarily. Stars measure attention, not adoption — a repository can trend for a week and be abandoned. That is why we show the weekly change from our own snapshots next to the total, instead of a single flattering number.

Keep going