jru-referee-strategy
Use when anticipating likely referee objections for a Journal of Risk and Uncertainty (JRU) manuscript before submission. Wargames the report a risk/uncertainty specialist would write; it does not invent evidence or citations.
Profile →npx skills add brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills --skill jru-referee-strategy --agent claude-code
Same command for any agent — swap --agent for codex, cursor, copilot.
Weekly change comes from our own snapshots, not the repository page — it measures attention, not adoption.
# Referee Strategy (jru-referee-strategy) ## When to trigger - The draft is nearly done and you want to pre-empt the objections a JRU referee will raise - You are choosing what to put in the main text vs. the appendix to disarm predictable pushback - The paper makes a strong EU-vs-alternatives claim and you expect a referee from the camp it challenges - You suspect the elicitation or the VSL identification has a soft spot a specialist will find ## Who reviews for JRU, and what they hunt for JRU's reviewer pool is specialized — decision theorists, experimental risk researchers, and VSL/insurance empiricists, under a single-blind model typical of Springer econ journals (待核实). Each subculture has a signature objection. Wargame the report by reading the paper as each of these referees would. | Referee type | Their reflex objection | Pre-empt by | |--------------|------------------------|-------------| | Decision theorist | "The representation has no behavioral content / the reference point is fit, not fixed" | Stating one prediction the model forbids; fixing the reference point a priori (`jru-theory-model`) | | Experimentalist | "The elicitation is not incentive-compatible / it confoun
- When to trigger
- Who reviews for JRU, and what they hunt for
- How to wargame
- The questions a JRU report almost always asks
- Worked second pass: choosing what to promote
- Checklist
- Suggesting and excluding reviewers
- Anti-patterns
- Worked vignette (illustrative)
- Output format
What does the jru-referee-strategy skill do?
Use when anticipating likely referee objections for a Journal of Risk and Uncertainty (JRU) manuscript before submission. Wargames the report a risk/uncertainty specialist would write; it does not invent evidence or citations.
How do I install it?
Run `npx skills add brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills --skill jru-referee-strategy --agent claude-code` — it drops the skill into your project so the agent can pick it up. Swap the --agent value for codex, cursor or copilot if you use one of those.
Where does this skill come from?
From brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills, a repository with 984 stars. We read it straight from the repository tree rather than a submitted listing, so what you see here is what is actually published.
Is a popular skill a good skill?
Not necessarily. Stars measure attention, not adoption — a repository can trend for a week and be abandoned. That is why we show the weekly change from our own snapshots next to the total, instead of a single flattering number.