Agent skill

jmis-rebuttal

Use when planning and drafting the response to a Journal of Management Information Systems (JMIS) major/minor revision — a point-by-point reply to the EIC, Associate Editor, and double-anonymized referees that resolves identification, measurement, contribution, and robustness concerns. Plans and drafts the response; revisit earlier jmis-* skills to execute the underlying fixes.

brycew6m4,252★ · +31/wk · 3 repos on radarProfile →
claude-codeMIT
Install
npx skills add brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills --skill jmis-rebuttal --agent claude-code

Same command for any agent — swap --agent for codex, cursor, copilot.

Facts
Files in the skill folder: 1
SKILL.md size: 7 KB
Bundled scripts: none
Path: Journal-of-Management-Information-Systems-Skills/skills/jmis-rebuttal/SKILL.md
Open the folder on GitHub →
Where it comes from
Stars: 984 · +31 this week
Language: Stata
Read our review of the source →

Weekly change comes from our own snapshots, not the repository page — it measures attention, not adoption.

From the SKILL.md

# Rebuttal Strategy (jmis-rebuttal) ## When to trigger - A JMIS major- or minor-revision letter arrived and you need a response plan - Referee and AE comments conflict and you must decide whom to follow - A reviewer asks for analysis you have not run, or challenges the contribution's IS relevance - You need a point-by-point response letter that the EIC and AE can adjudicate quickly ## Triage before you draft JMIS revisions come back through an **EIC-led, double-anonymized** process: the EIC and Associate Editor weigh the referees, so your response is read by people deciding whether you have *resolved* concerns, not merely answered them. Triage every comment: 1. **Fit / contribution concerns first.** If the AE or EIC doubts the IS-management contribution, no robustness check rescues it — re-run `jmis-contribution-framing` and lead the letter with the reframe. 2. **Identification / measurement / robustness.** Classify each as a real fix (new analysis), a clarification (already in the paper, surface it), or a defensible decline (explain why the request is not appropriate, with evidence). 3. **Cosmetic / clarity.** Batch and resolve quickly. ## Weight the AE over a divergent referee, b

What's inside
Steps it walks through
  1. When to trigger
  2. Triage before you draft
  3. Weight the AE over a divergent referee, but answer everyone
  4. Draft the point-by-point response
  5. Match the fix to the right skill
  6. Checklist
  7. Anti-patterns
  8. Structure the response document for fast adjudication
  9. Route the underlying work, then write the letter
  10. Output format
More from Awesome-Journal-Skills
All skills →
About this skill
What does the jmis-rebuttal skill do?

Use when planning and drafting the response to a Journal of Management Information Systems (JMIS) major/minor revision — a point-by-point reply to the EIC, Associate Editor, and double-anonymized referees that resolves identification, measurement, contribution, and robustness concerns. Plans and drafts the response; revisit earlier jmis-* skills to execute the underlying fixes.

How do I install it?

Run `npx skills add brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills --skill jmis-rebuttal --agent claude-code` — it drops the skill into your project so the agent can pick it up. Swap the --agent value for codex, cursor or copilot if you use one of those.

Where does this skill come from?

From brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills, a repository with 984 stars. We read it straight from the repository tree rather than a submitted listing, so what you see here is what is actually published.

Is a popular skill a good skill?

Not necessarily. Stars measure attention, not adoption — a repository can trend for a week and be abandoned. That is why we show the weekly change from our own snapshots next to the total, instead of a single flattering number.

Keep going