Agent skill

jmis-literature-positioning

Use when staking a Journal of Management Information Systems (JMIS) manuscript's contribution against the IS literature and the basket siblings — showing it advances an IS-management/economics conversation rather than only a reference discipline. Positions the work; it does not build the mechanism (jmis-theory-development) or write the contribution statement (jmis-contribution-framing).

brycew6m4,252★ · +31/wk · 3 repos on radarProfile →
claude-codeMIT
Install
npx skills add brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills --skill jmis-literature-positioning --agent claude-code

Same command for any agent — swap --agent for codex, cursor, copilot.

Facts
Files in the skill folder: 1
SKILL.md size: 8 KB
Bundled scripts: none
Path: Journal-of-Management-Information-Systems-Skills/skills/jmis-literature-positioning/SKILL.md
Open the folder on GitHub →
Where it comes from
Stars: 984 · +31 this week
Language: Stata
Read our review of the source →

Weekly change comes from our own snapshots, not the repository page — it measures attention, not adoption.

From the SKILL.md

# Literature Positioning (jmis-literature-positioning) ## When to trigger - The front end reads as a reference-discipline paper (pure economics, marketing, CS, OB) that merely uses an IS setting - You cannot name the specific IS conversation you are joining and changing - A reviewer says the contribution is incremental, or that the paper "ignores prior IS work" - You are unsure whether the natural home is JMIS, MISQ, ISR, JAIS, or Management Science ## Position to an IS conversation, not just a reference discipline JMIS is an IS journal, so the literature you must engage first is the **IS literature** — IT business value, digital platforms, e-commerce, IS economics, security/privacy, decision support/analytics — even when your toolkit comes from economics or computer science. The test a JMIS reviewer applies: *what did the IS field believe, and how does this paper move that belief?* Borrowing a reference-discipline method is fine; positioning the contribution *only* in the reference discipline is a desk-reject signal because the IS audience cannot see the advance. ## Build the positioning in three moves 1. **Name the stream and its current frontier.** State the specific JMIS-releva

What's inside
Steps it walks through
  1. When to trigger
  2. Position to an IS conversation, not just a reference discipline
  3. Build the positioning in three moves
  4. Engage the basket and cite the right precedents
  5. Use sibling boundaries to sharpen, not just to defend
  6. Worked vignette: turning an absence into a tension (illustrative)
  7. Referee pushback mapped to a repositioning move
  8. Checklist
  9. Show you know the JMIS conversation specifically
  10. Anti-patterns
  11. A three-paragraph positioning skeleton
  12. Keep positioning honest about what is new
  13. Output format
More from Awesome-Journal-Skills
All skills →
About this skill
What does the jmis-literature-positioning skill do?

Use when staking a Journal of Management Information Systems (JMIS) manuscript's contribution against the IS literature and the basket siblings — showing it advances an IS-management/economics conversation rather than only a reference discipline. Positions the work; it does not build the mechanism (jmis-theory-development) or write the contribution statement (jmis-contribution-framing).

How do I install it?

Run `npx skills add brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills --skill jmis-literature-positioning --agent claude-code` — it drops the skill into your project so the agent can pick it up. Swap the --agent value for codex, cursor or copilot if you use one of those.

Where does this skill come from?

From brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills, a repository with 984 stars. We read it straight from the repository tree rather than a submitted listing, so what you see here is what is actually published.

Is a popular skill a good skill?

Not necessarily. Stars measure attention, not adoption — a repository can trend for a week and be abandoned. That is why we show the weekly change from our own snapshots next to the total, instead of a single flattering number.

Keep going