jmis-contribution-framing
Use when turning results into an explicit contribution for a Journal of Management Information Systems (JMIS) manuscript — an advance to an IS-management/economics conversation with theoretical and managerial implications. Frames the contribution and aligns intro/discussion; it does not position the literature (jmis-literature-positioning) or run the submission preflight (jmis-submission).
Profile →npx skills add brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills --skill jmis-contribution-framing --agent claude-code
Same command for any agent — swap --agent for codex, cursor, copilot.
Weekly change comes from our own snapshots, not the repository page — it measures attention, not adoption.
# Contribution Framing (jmis-contribution-framing) ## When to trigger - Results exist but the "so what for IS management" is thin or implicit - A reviewer or the EIC says the contribution is incremental or reads as a reference-discipline result - The paper is a competent study with no clear advance to a JMIS conversation - The introduction's "we show that…" sentences and the discussion's implications do not match ## What counts as a JMIS contribution JMIS rewards a contribution to the **technology–organization–economics nexus**: a finding that changes what the IS field believes *and* what a manager, firm, platform, or policymaker should do about technology. Strong JMIS contributions: - **Advance a named IS conversation** (IT value, platforms, e-commerce, IS economics, security/privacy, analytics) — not only a reference discipline. - **Make the IT artifact essential** to the advance: delete the technology and the contribution collapses. - **Carry a managerial/economic payload.** Beyond theory, say what changes for practice — pricing, governance, investment, design, policy. JMIS's identity makes the practical implication first-class, not an afterthought. - **Match the genre's currenc
- When to trigger
- What counts as a JMIS contribution
- Write the contribution as a claim narrower than your evidence
- Align the introduction and discussion
- Decision ledger to hand to the next pass
- Worked vignette: narrowing the claim to fit the evidence (illustrative)
- Referee pushback mapped to a framing fix
- Checklist
- Make the dual contribution explicit
- Anti-patterns
- Calibrate the contribution to the genre's currency
- Test the contribution against the EIC's fit gate
- Output format
What does the jmis-contribution-framing skill do?
Use when turning results into an explicit contribution for a Journal of Management Information Systems (JMIS) manuscript — an advance to an IS-management/economics conversation with theoretical and managerial implications. Frames the contribution and aligns intro/discussion; it does not position the literature (jmis-literature-positioning) or run the submission preflight (jmis-submission).
How do I install it?
Run `npx skills add brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills --skill jmis-contribution-framing --agent claude-code` — it drops the skill into your project so the agent can pick it up. Swap the --agent value for codex, cursor or copilot if you use one of those.
Where does this skill come from?
From brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills, a repository with 984 stars. We read it straight from the repository tree rather than a submitted listing, so what you see here is what is actually published.
Is a popular skill a good skill?
Not necessarily. Stars measure attention, not adoption — a repository can trend for a week and be abandoned. That is why we show the weekly change from our own snapshots next to the total, instead of a single flattering number.