Agent skill

jme-contribution-framing

Use when sharpening the "what is new and why it matters for macro/policy" claim of a Journal of Monetary Economics (JME) manuscript — turning a result into a first-order monetary-economics contribution that clears a single-blind, two-referee, "up or out" process.

brycew6m4,252★ · +31/wk · 3 repos on radarProfile →
claude-codeMIT
Install
npx skills add brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills --skill jme-contribution-framing --agent claude-code

Same command for any agent — swap --agent for codex, cursor, copilot.

Facts
Files in the skill folder: 1
SKILL.md size: 4 KB
Bundled scripts: none
Path: Journal-of-Monetary-Economics-Skills/skills/jme-contribution-framing/SKILL.md
Open the folder on GitHub →
Where it comes from
Stars: 984 · +31 this week
Language: Stata
Read our review of the source →

Weekly change comes from our own snapshots, not the repository page — it measures attention, not adoption.

From the SKILL.md

# Contribution Framing (jme-contribution-framing) ## When to trigger - The result exists but the "so what for monetary economics / policy?" is undersold - The abstract and intro list findings without a single sharp contribution claim - You need the pitch to survive a desk screen and convince two expert referees - You want the framing to justify an R&R invitation (the editor's ~50% publication-likelihood bar) ## Why framing is high-stakes at JME JME has a **distinctive selection funnel**. A first-round decision is **reject or revise-and-resubmit**, and editors invite a resubmission **only when they judge at least a 50% likelihood of ultimate publication** — so an R&R is a strong signal, and a sharp contribution claim is what tips a borderline paper into that bucket. The resubmission is then **"up or out"**: it ends in acceptance or rejection, with no second R&R round. Because review is **single anonymized** with a **minimum of two reviewers**, your framing has to convince specialists who can see your name and will judge the marginal contribution directly. The contribution should be legible to a macroeconomist or central banker, not just to the narrow sub-field. A JME contribution us

What's inside
Steps it walks through
  1. When to trigger
  2. Why framing is high-stakes at JME
  3. Framing checklist
  4. Anti-patterns
  5. Contribution pass for Journal of Monetary Economics
  6. Output format
More from Awesome-Journal-Skills
All skills →
About this skill
What does the jme-contribution-framing skill do?

Use when sharpening the "what is new and why it matters for macro/policy" claim of a Journal of Monetary Economics (JME) manuscript — turning a result into a first-order monetary-economics contribution that clears a single-blind, two-referee, "up or out" process.

How do I install it?

Run `npx skills add brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills --skill jme-contribution-framing --agent claude-code` — it drops the skill into your project so the agent can pick it up. Swap the --agent value for codex, cursor or copilot if you use one of those.

Where does this skill come from?

From brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills, a repository with 984 stars. We read it straight from the repository tree rather than a submitted listing, so what you see here is what is actually published.

Is a popular skill a good skill?

Not necessarily. Stars measure attention, not adoption — a repository can trend for a week and be abandoned. That is why we show the weekly change from our own snapshots next to the total, instead of a single flattering number.

Keep going