Agent skill

jep-evidence-without-equations

Use when presenting empirical or theoretical evidence credibly in a Journal of Economic Perspectives (JEP) article with minimal math — intuition, examples, well-chosen numbers, and honest caveats. Handles how evidence is conveyed in prose; defer figures/tables to jep-exhibits-for-general-readers and fairness across studies to jep-balance-and-objectivity.

brycew6m4,252★ · +31/wk · 3 repos on radarProfile →
claude-codeMIT
Install
npx skills add brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills --skill jep-evidence-without-equations --agent claude-code

Same command for any agent — swap --agent for codex, cursor, copilot.

Facts
Files in the skill folder: 1
SKILL.md size: 5 KB
Bundled scripts: none
Path: Journal-of-Economic-Perspectives-Skills/skills/jep-evidence-without-equations/SKILL.md
Open the folder on GitHub →
Where it comes from
Stars: 984 · +31 this week
Language: Stata
Read our review of the source →

Weekly change comes from our own snapshots, not the repository page — it measures attention, not adoption.

From the SKILL.md

# Evidence Without Equations (jep-evidence-without-equations) ## When to trigger - You need to convince a reader of a finding without a regression table in the body - The draft leans on "significant at the 1% level" or coefficient dumps to make its case - You have many numbers and aren't sure which few to feature - You worry that going light on math will make the evidence look soft ## The JEP evidence bar JEP communicates evidence through **intuition, well-chosen numbers, and honest caveats**, not through equations and estimation tables in the body. The credibility comes from *which* evidence you feature, *how clearly* you convey magnitude, and *how honestly* you state limits — not from displaying machinery. A JEP reader should finish a paragraph knowing the *size* of an effect, *how sure* the field is, and *what could be wrong*. ## How to present evidence credibly with little math - **Lead with magnitude in plain units.** "Roughly a third of the cost is passed through to prices" beats a coefficient. Translate elasticities/log points into amounts a reader feels (dollars, percentage points, days). - **Pick a few load-bearing numbers.** Two or three vivid, well-sourced figures land;

What's inside
Steps it walks through
  1. When to trigger
  2. The JEP evidence bar
  3. How to present evidence credibly with little math
  4. Honesty devices (build credibility without machinery)
  5. Checklist
  6. Worked vignette (illustrative)
  7. Anti-patterns
  8. Output format
More from Awesome-Journal-Skills
All skills →
About this skill
What does the jep-evidence-without-equations skill do?

Use when presenting empirical or theoretical evidence credibly in a Journal of Economic Perspectives (JEP) article with minimal math — intuition, examples, well-chosen numbers, and honest caveats. Handles how evidence is conveyed in prose; defer figures/tables to jep-exhibits-for-general-readers and fairness across studies to jep-balance-and-objectivity.

How do I install it?

Run `npx skills add brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills --skill jep-evidence-without-equations --agent claude-code` — it drops the skill into your project so the agent can pick it up. Swap the --agent value for codex, cursor or copilot if you use one of those.

Where does this skill come from?

From brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills, a repository with 984 stars. We read it straight from the repository tree rather than a submitted listing, so what you see here is what is actually published.

Is a popular skill a good skill?

Not necessarily. Stars measure attention, not adoption — a repository can trend for a week and be abandoned. That is why we show the weekly change from our own snapshots next to the total, instead of a single flattering number.

Keep going