Agent skill

jel-editor-strategy

Use when working with the editor and referees of a Journal of Economic Literature (JEL) survey — scope negotiation, what survey referees evaluate, and revision expectations. Plans the interaction; it does not run the submission preflight (jel-submission) or draft the response letter (jel-revision).

brycew6m4,252★ · +31/wk · 3 repos on radarProfile →
claude-codeMIT
Install
npx skills add brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills --skill jel-editor-strategy --agent claude-code

Same command for any agent — swap --agent for codex, cursor, copilot.

Facts
Files in the skill folder: 1
SKILL.md size: 5 KB
Bundled scripts: none
Path: Journal-of-Economic-Literature-Skills/skills/jel-editor-strategy/SKILL.md
Open the folder on GitHub →
Where it comes from
Stars: 984 · +31 this week
Language: Stata
Read our review of the source →

Weekly change comes from our own snapshots, not the repository page — it measures attention, not adoption.

From the SKILL.md

# Editor & Referee Strategy for a Survey (jel-editor-strategy) ## When to trigger - The editor encouraged the proposal and you are negotiating the survey's scope - You want to anticipate what JEL referees of a *survey* will push on (different from a paper) - The editor has asked you to expand, cut, or rebalance coverage - You are calibrating how many revision rounds and how long a JEL survey typically takes ## How review differs for a survey JEL referees do **not** check an identification strategy or replicate results — there are none of the author's own. They evaluate the survey **as a survey**: | Referee question | What they are really checking | |------------------|-------------------------------| | Is the coverage complete? | the saturation/comprehensiveness from `jel-literature-synthesis` — can they name an omitted literature? | | Is it balanced? | even-handedness across schools; no self-promotion (`jel-comprehensiveness-and-balance`) | | Is there a real framework? | the spine vs. an annotated bibliography (`jel-organizing-framework`) | | Is it accessible? | can a non-specialist (the JEL reader) follow it (`jel-writing-style`) | | Are the appraisals fair and correct? | does th

What's inside
Steps it walks through
  1. When to trigger
  2. How review differs for a survey
  3. Scope negotiation with the editor
  4. Checklist
  5. Anti-patterns
  6. Output format
More from Awesome-Journal-Skills
All skills →
About this skill
What does the jel-editor-strategy skill do?

Use when working with the editor and referees of a Journal of Economic Literature (JEL) survey — scope negotiation, what survey referees evaluate, and revision expectations. Plans the interaction; it does not run the submission preflight (jel-submission) or draft the response letter (jel-revision).

How do I install it?

Run `npx skills add brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills --skill jel-editor-strategy --agent claude-code` — it drops the skill into your project so the agent can pick it up. Swap the --agent value for codex, cursor or copilot if you use one of those.

Where does this skill come from?

From brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills, a repository with 984 stars. We read it straight from the repository tree rather than a submitted listing, so what you see here is what is actually published.

Is a popular skill a good skill?

Not necessarily. Stars measure attention, not adoption — a repository can trend for a week and be abandoned. That is why we show the weekly change from our own snapshots next to the total, instead of a single flattering number.

Keep going