Agent skill

jegeo-referee-strategy

Use when anticipating referee objections for a Journal of Economic Geography (JEG) manuscript, where the panel typically pairs an economist with a geographer. Maps likely cross-disciplinary objections to fixes; it does not invent results.

brycew6m4,252★ · +31/wk · 3 repos on radarProfile →
claude-codeMIT
Install
npx skills add brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills --skill jegeo-referee-strategy --agent claude-code

Same command for any agent — swap --agent for codex, cursor, copilot.

Facts
Files in the skill folder: 1
SKILL.md size: 7 KB
Bundled scripts: none
Path: Journal-of-Economic-Geography-Skills/skills/jegeo-referee-strategy/SKILL.md
Open the folder on GitHub →
Where it comes from
Stars: 984 · +31 this week
Language: Stata
Read our review of the source →

Weekly change comes from our own snapshots, not the repository page — it measures attention, not adoption.

From the SKILL.md

# Referee Strategy (jegeo-referee-strategy) ## When to trigger - Before submission, to pre-empt the objections a two-community panel will raise - The paper leans heavily toward one tradition and you need to armor the side a hostile referee will attack - You want to decide which robustness/exhibit work is worth doing *now* vs. holding for an R&R - You are choosing which reviewers to suggest or oppose for a JEG submission ## The defining feature: you will face both communities JEG's review almost always pairs **an economist** and **a geographer** (the board is drawn from both, and editors deliberately route across the bridge). Their objections are systematically different, and a paper that satisfies one often provokes the other. Plan for both, in one manuscript, under **double-anonymous** review. | The economist referee tends to attack | The geographer referee tends to attack | |----------------------------------------|----------------------------------------| | identification, selection, weak instruments | "where is the geography?" — space as mere fixed effect | | spatial autocorrelation / overstated inference | absence of mechanism, context, or institutional texture | | external va

What's inside
Steps it walks through
  1. When to trigger
  2. The defining feature: you will face both communities
  3. Pre-empting each side
  4. Triage: fix now vs. hold for R&R
  5. Reviewer suggestions
  6. The cover letter as a routing signal
  7. Checklist
  8. Anti-patterns
  9. Worked vignette (illustrative)
  10. A simple pre-submission red-team
  11. Output format
More from Awesome-Journal-Skills
All skills →
About this skill
What does the jegeo-referee-strategy skill do?

Use when anticipating referee objections for a Journal of Economic Geography (JEG) manuscript, where the panel typically pairs an economist with a geographer. Maps likely cross-disciplinary objections to fixes; it does not invent results.

How do I install it?

Run `npx skills add brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills --skill jegeo-referee-strategy --agent claude-code` — it drops the skill into your project so the agent can pick it up. Swap the --agent value for codex, cursor or copilot if you use one of those.

Where does this skill come from?

From brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills, a repository with 984 stars. We read it straight from the repository tree rather than a submitted listing, so what you see here is what is actually published.

Is a popular skill a good skill?

Not necessarily. Stars measure attention, not adoption — a repository can trend for a week and be abandoned. That is why we show the weekly change from our own snapshots next to the total, instead of a single flattering number.

Keep going