Agent skill

jae-rebuttal

Use when planning revisions and drafting the point-by-point response for a Journal of Accounting and Economics (JAE) revise-and-resubmit — prioritizing the editor's identification and contribution concerns, satisfying economics-trained reviewers with new tests, and noting that resubmissions carry no submission fee.

brycew6m4,252★ · +31/wk · 3 repos on radarProfile →
claude-codeMIT
Install
npx skills add brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills --skill jae-rebuttal --agent claude-code

Same command for any agent — swap --agent for codex, cursor, copilot.

Facts
Files in the skill folder: 1
SKILL.md size: 5 KB
Bundled scripts: none
Path: Journal-of-Accounting-and-Economics-Skills/skills/jae-rebuttal/SKILL.md
Open the folder on GitHub →
Where it comes from
Stars: 984 · +31 this week
Language: Stata
Read our review of the source →

Weekly change comes from our own snapshots, not the repository page — it measures attention, not adoption.

From the SKILL.md

# R&R Revision & Response for JAE (jae-rebuttal) ## When to trigger - You received a JAE revise-and-resubmit and must plan the revision - Reviewers demand additional identification, mechanism, or robustness tests - You need to write the point-by-point response letter - You are unsure how to reconcile conflicting reviewer requests ## Revise before you write the letter Do the empirical and theoretical work **first**; the response letter documents revisions already made, not promises. At JAE the binding hierarchy is: the **Editor's letter first** (the contribution framing and the identification that must hold), then each **reviewer** point. Where the editor and a reviewer conflict, follow the editor and explain the resolution courteously. ## Prioritize what JAE referees care about Because the decision rests on **economic mechanism and identification**, allocate effort accordingly: - **Identification challenges**: add the natural experiment, instrument, placebo, or pre-trend evidence the referee wants; if a clean design is impossible, bound the bias and argue robustness honestly. - **Mechanism**: add cross-sectional partitions showing the effect concentrates where the economic friction

What's inside
Steps it walks through
  1. When to trigger
  2. Revise before you write the letter
  3. Prioritize what JAE referees care about
  4. Writing the point-by-point response
  5. Practical notes
  6. Checklist
  7. Anti-patterns
  8. Response pass for Journal of Accounting and Economics
  9. Output format
More from Awesome-Journal-Skills
All skills →
About this skill
What does the jae-rebuttal skill do?

Use when planning revisions and drafting the point-by-point response for a Journal of Accounting and Economics (JAE) revise-and-resubmit — prioritizing the editor's identification and contribution concerns, satisfying economics-trained reviewers with new tests, and noting that resubmissions carry no submission fee.

How do I install it?

Run `npx skills add brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills --skill jae-rebuttal --agent claude-code` — it drops the skill into your project so the agent can pick it up. Swap the --agent value for codex, cursor or copilot if you use one of those.

Where does this skill come from?

From brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills, a repository with 984 stars. We read it straight from the repository tree rather than a submitted listing, so what you see here is what is actually published.

Is a popular skill a good skill?

Not necessarily. Stars measure attention, not adoption — a repository can trend for a week and be abandoned. That is why we show the weekly change from our own snapshots next to the total, instead of a single flattering number.

Keep going