Agent skill

jaar-sources-and-evidence

Use when handling the evidence base of a Journal of the American Academy of Religion (JAAR) article — primary texts, traditions, historical documents, material/visual sources, or ethnographic fieldwork. Plans rigorous, transparent source work for humanities scholarship in the study of religion; it does not run statistics.

brycew6m4,252★ · +31/wk · 3 repos on radarProfile →
claude-codeMIT
Install
npx skills add brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills --skill jaar-sources-and-evidence --agent claude-code

Same command for any agent — swap --agent for codex, cursor, copilot.

Facts
Files in the skill folder: 1
SKILL.md size: 6 KB
Bundled scripts: none
Path: Journal-of-the-American-Academy-of-Religion-Skills/skills/jaar-sources-and-evidence/SKILL.md
Open the folder on GitHub →
Where it comes from
Stars: 984 · +31 this week
Language: Stata
Read our review of the source →

Weekly change comes from our own snapshots, not the repository page — it measures attention, not adoption.

From the SKILL.md

# Sources & Evidence (jaar-sources-and-evidence) Religious-studies scholarship rests on **primary materials**: scriptures and commentaries, ritual and liturgical texts, historical archives, material and visual culture, or fieldwork. JAAR judges whether your handling of these sources is careful, well-situated, and adequate to the claim. This is humanities evidence — no datasets or replication, but rigor still governs. ## When to trigger - Selecting and justifying the primary sources the argument rests on - A reviewer questioned your translation, dating, provenance, or representativeness - Integrating fieldwork/interviews into a humanities argument - Deciding what is primary vs. secondary and how much to quote ## Source-work standards JAAR expects 1. **Cite from primary sources.** Ground claims in the texts/traditions/objects themselves, not only in others' summaries; secondary literature situates, primary evidence proves. 2. **Languages and translation.** Work from originals where the argument depends on wording; state which edition/translation you use and why; flag contested terms (and consider transliteration conventions). 3. **Provenance, dating, and context.** Establish what a s

What's inside
Steps it walks through
  1. When to trigger
  2. Source-work standards JAAR expects
  3. Quoting and apparatus
  4. Anti-patterns
  5. Output format
  6. Evidence-type rigor matrix
  7. Worked vignette: an over-reaching textual claim, right-sized
  8. Source-handling pushback → the fix
  9. Supplementary resources
More from Awesome-Journal-Skills
All skills →
About this skill
What does the jaar-sources-and-evidence skill do?

Use when handling the evidence base of a Journal of the American Academy of Religion (JAAR) article — primary texts, traditions, historical documents, material/visual sources, or ethnographic fieldwork. Plans rigorous, transparent source work for humanities scholarship in the study of religion; it does not run statistics.

How do I install it?

Run `npx skills add brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills --skill jaar-sources-and-evidence --agent claude-code` — it drops the skill into your project so the agent can pick it up. Swap the --agent value for codex, cursor or copilot if you use one of those.

Where does this skill come from?

From brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills, a repository with 984 stars. We read it straight from the repository tree rather than a submitted listing, so what you see here is what is actually published.

Is a popular skill a good skill?

Not necessarily. Stars measure attention, not adoption — a repository can trend for a week and be abandoned. That is why we show the weekly change from our own snapshots next to the total, instead of a single flattering number.

Keep going