Agent skill

itcs-reproducibility

Use to make an ITCS paper's mathematics independently checkable — complete proofs of every central claim, self-contained definitions, pinned dependencies on prior results, and a matching full version on arXiv/ECCC/ePrint — the pure-theory analogue of a reproducibility package.

brycew6m4,252★ · +31/wk · 3 repos on radarProfile →
claude-codeMIT
Install
npx skills add brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills --skill itcs-reproducibility --agent claude-code

Same command for any agent — swap --agent for codex, cursor, copilot.

Facts
Files in the skill folder: 1
SKILL.md size: 6 KB
Bundled scripts: none
Path: ITCS-Skills/skills/itcs-reproducibility/SKILL.md
Open the folder on GitHub →
Where it comes from
Stars: 984 · +31 this week
Language: Stata
Read our review of the source →

Weekly change comes from our own snapshots, not the repository page — it measures attention, not adoption.

From the SKILL.md

# ITCS Reproducibility "Reproducibility" at a pure-theory venue means one thing: **a competent, skeptical reader can verify every central claim from the paper alone.** There is no code to rerun and no dataset to re-mine — the analogue of a reproducibility package is a **complete, self-contained, correctly attributed proof**. ITCS makes this concrete in its call: submissions must include **complete proofs of all central claims** (in an appendix if needed). This skill is the discipline that makes the mathematics checkable, which — since ITCS has **no rebuttal** — is also your only defense against a reviewer who gets stuck. ## Completeness: every central claim is fully proved - **No "proof omitted," no "proof is standard," no "see the full version"** for anything a reviewer must check to believe the result. Deferring a *routine* calculation to an appendix is fine; deferring the *load-bearing* lemma is a reproducibility failure and, at ITCS, a likely reject. - **Distinguish proved from assumed.** Every step is either proved here or cited to a precise prior result. A theorem that quietly relies on an unproved claim is the theory analogue of a package that silently calls a missing depend

What's inside
Steps it walks through
  1. Completeness: every central claim is fully proved
  2. Self-containment: definitions and notation
  3. Dependency provenance: pin what you borrow
  4. The full version as the durable record
  5. The checkability passes (run before upload)
  6. Common failure modes
  7. Output format
More from Awesome-Journal-Skills
All skills →
About this skill
What does the itcs-reproducibility skill do?

Use to make an ITCS paper's mathematics independently checkable — complete proofs of every central claim, self-contained definitions, pinned dependencies on prior results, and a matching full version on arXiv/ECCC/ePrint — the pure-theory analogue of a reproducibility package.

How do I install it?

Run `npx skills add brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills --skill itcs-reproducibility --agent claude-code` — it drops the skill into your project so the agent can pick it up. Swap the --agent value for codex, cursor or copilot if you use one of those.

Where does this skill come from?

From brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills, a repository with 984 stars. We read it straight from the repository tree rather than a submitted listing, so what you see here is what is actually published.

Is a popular skill a good skill?

Not necessarily. Stars measure attention, not adoption — a repository can trend for a week and be abandoned. That is why we show the weekly change from our own snapshots next to the total, instead of a single flattering number.

Keep going