icsme-supplementary
Use when deciding what belongs in an IEEE ICSME paper body versus its anonymized artifact and appendices, covering the IEEEtran two-column 10-page budget where figures and appendices count, the rule that decision-critical evidence stays inside the reviewed pages, double-anonymous supplementary material, and how to split a mining/evolution paper between body and package.
Profile →npx skills add brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills --skill icsme-supplementary --agent claude-code
Same command for any agent — swap --agent for codex, cursor, copilot.
Weekly change comes from our own snapshots, not the repository page — it measures attention, not adoption.
# ICSME Supplementary Use this when assembling ICSME supplementary material. The governing rule is simple and strict: **the paper must be judgeable from the reviewed pages alone.** The artifact and any appendix support the paper; they do not hold the argument. Reviewers read the artifact at their discretion, so anything the decision depends on lives in the 10 pages — and there is no revision round to move it in later. ## What goes where | Content | Body (within the 10-page budget) | Artifact / appendix | |---|---|---| | Research questions and their answers | Yes | — | | Core technique or study design | Yes | Full parameter grids, extra config | | The headline evolution results and their threats | Yes | Full result tables, secondary plots | | Statistical tests behind a claim | The result + test named | The computation notebook | | Subject-system list and selection criterion | Summary + criterion | The complete list with SHAs | | Mining pipeline detail | The protocol in prose | The scripts and pipeline diagram | | Raw corpus, logs, scripts | — | Yes | | Reproduction instructions | A pointer | The README and run scripts | If a reviewer would need to open the artifact to know whether t
- What goes where
- The 10-page discipline (figures and appendices count)
- Double-anonymous supplementary rules
- Appendix architecture (within the budget)
- Vignette: splitting a mining + interview paper
- Output format
What does the icsme-supplementary skill do?
Use when deciding what belongs in an IEEE ICSME paper body versus its anonymized artifact and appendices, covering the IEEEtran two-column 10-page budget where figures and appendices count, the rule that decision-critical evidence stays inside the reviewed pages, double-anonymous supplementary material, and how to split a mining/evolution paper between body and package.
How do I install it?
Run `npx skills add brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills --skill icsme-supplementary --agent claude-code` — it drops the skill into your project so the agent can pick it up. Swap the --agent value for codex, cursor or copilot if you use one of those.
Where does this skill come from?
From brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills, a repository with 984 stars. We read it straight from the repository tree rather than a submitted listing, so what you see here is what is actually published.
Is a popular skill a good skill?
Not necessarily. Stars measure attention, not adoption — a repository can trend for a week and be abandoned. That is why we show the weekly change from our own snapshots next to the total, instead of a single flattering number.