Agent skill

humrel-contribution-framing

Use when sharpening the theoretical contribution and the "so what" for a Human Relations (HR) manuscript once results exist. Frames the contribution; it does not develop the underlying theory or run analysis.

brycew6m4,252★ · +31/wk · 3 repos on radarProfile →
claude-codeMIT
Install
npx skills add brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills --skill humrel-contribution-framing --agent claude-code

Same command for any agent — swap --agent for codex, cursor, copilot.

Facts
Files in the skill folder: 1
SKILL.md size: 5 KB
Bundled scripts: none
Path: Human-Relations-Skills/skills/humrel-contribution-framing/SKILL.md
Open the folder on GitHub →
Where it comes from
Stars: 984 · +31 this week
Language: Stata
Read our review of the source →

Weekly change comes from our own snapshots, not the repository page — it measures attention, not adoption.

From the SKILL.md

# Contribution Framing (humrel-contribution-framing) ## When to trigger - Results exist but you cannot state the contribution in one crisp sentence - The intro/discussion reads as "we found X" rather than "we change how the field understands work" - A reviewer says "interesting findings, but what is the theoretical contribution?" - The paper risks reading as a vivid case, a method demonstration, or a managerial how-to ## The HR deliverable: a substantive theoretical contribution HR's explicit gate is **"a unique and substantive theoretical contribution"** to understanding work and organizations as social phenomena. A finding answers a question; a contribution **reframes the question or overturns a prior** in a way readers across organization studies, sociology, and psychology can use. Frame around the surprise from `humrel-topic-selection` and the mechanism from `humrel-theory-development`. What is *not* the HR deliverable: a firm-performance improvement (a JMS register), a well-powered confirmation of a moderated hypothesis (an AMJ profile), a pure critique with no constructive claim (closer to Organization), or a rich description that never theorizes (closer to Work, Employment a

What's inside
Steps it walks through
  1. When to trigger
  2. The HR deliverable: a substantive theoretical contribution
  3. Name your contribution type
  4. The contribution paragraph
  5. Discussion that earns HR acceptance
  6. Calibrate the claim
  7. Checklist
  8. Anti-patterns
  9. Output format
More from Awesome-Journal-Skills
All skills →
About this skill
What does the humrel-contribution-framing skill do?

Use when sharpening the theoretical contribution and the "so what" for a Human Relations (HR) manuscript once results exist. Frames the contribution; it does not develop the underlying theory or run analysis.

How do I install it?

Run `npx skills add brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills --skill humrel-contribution-framing --agent claude-code` — it drops the skill into your project so the agent can pick it up. Swap the --agent value for codex, cursor or copilot if you use one of those.

Where does this skill come from?

From brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills, a repository with 984 stars. We read it straight from the repository tree rather than a submitted listing, so what you see here is what is actually published.

Is a popular skill a good skill?

Not necessarily. Stars measure attention, not adoption — a repository can trend for a week and be abandoned. That is why we show the weekly change from our own snapshots next to the total, instead of a single flattering number.

Keep going