Agent skill

hpca-experiments

Use when auditing an HPCA evaluation: declaring the fidelity contract (simulator, configuration, workloads, sampled regions, validation), matching each claim to its instrument, capturing real-silicon machine state, tuning baselines honestly, and reporting per-workload distributions rather than a single mean.

brycew6m4,252★ · +31/wk · 3 repos on radarProfile →
claude-codeMIT
Install
npx skills add brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills --skill hpca-experiments --agent claude-code

Same command for any agent — swap --agent for codex, cursor, copilot.

Facts
Files in the skill folder: 1
SKILL.md size: 4 KB
Bundled scripts: none
Path: HPCA-Skills/skills/hpca-experiments/SKILL.md
Open the folder on GitHub →
Where it comes from
Stars: 984 · +31 this week
Language: Stata
Read our review of the source →

Weekly change comes from our own snapshots, not the repository page — it measures attention, not adoption.

From the SKILL.md

# HPCA Experiments Use this to stress-test an HPCA evaluation before the July gate. Architecture reviews are won and lost on methodology: a mechanism can be sound and still be rejected if the numbers cannot be trusted against their instrument. ## Declare the fidelity contract Every HPCA evaluation rests on a contract the paper must state explicitly: - **Tool and version.** Which simulator (and commit), or which real machine. - **Fidelity scope.** What the model captures and what it abstracts — an in-order functional model and a cycle-level OoO model make different claims believable. - **Configuration.** Core width, cache hierarchy, memory/DRAM timing model, interconnect — the parameters a reviewer needs to reproduce the setup. - **Workloads and regions.** The suite, the inputs, and how regions were sampled (e.g., SimPoint-style sampling) rather than run to completion. - **Validation.** What the timing models were validated against, with the error. A number outside its contract is unreviewable; a contract stated up front pre-empts half the methodology objections. ## Match each claim to its instrument | Claim type | Credible instrument | Not credible from | |---|---|---| | Cycle-leve

What's inside
Steps it walks through
  1. Declare the fidelity contract
  2. Match each claim to its instrument
  3. Capture machine state for silicon
  4. Tune baselines honestly
  5. Report the distribution
  6. Pre-submission audit
  7. Output format
More from Awesome-Journal-Skills
All skills →
About this skill
What does the hpca-experiments skill do?

Use when auditing an HPCA evaluation: declaring the fidelity contract (simulator, configuration, workloads, sampled regions, validation), matching each claim to its instrument, capturing real-silicon machine state, tuning baselines honestly, and reporting per-workload distributions rather than a single mean.

How do I install it?

Run `npx skills add brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills --skill hpca-experiments --agent claude-code` — it drops the skill into your project so the agent can pick it up. Swap the --agent value for codex, cursor or copilot if you use one of those.

Where does this skill come from?

From brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills, a repository with 984 stars. We read it straight from the repository tree rather than a submitted listing, so what you see here is what is actually published.

Is a popular skill a good skill?

Not necessarily. Stars measure attention, not adoption — a repository can trend for a week and be abandoned. That is why we show the weekly change from our own snapshots next to the total, instead of a single flattering number.

Keep going