Agent skill

geb-contribution-framing

Use when the "what does this advance in game theory?" sentence is missing or muddy for a Games and Economic Behavior (GEB) manuscript. Forges the single-sentence contribution and the introduction's claim structure so the Editor in Charge sees the advance immediately.

brycew6m4,252★ · +31/wk · 3 repos on radarProfile →
claude-codeMIT
Install
npx skills add brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills --skill geb-contribution-framing --agent claude-code

Same command for any agent — swap --agent for codex, cursor, copilot.

Facts
Files in the skill folder: 1
SKILL.md size: 6 KB
Bundled scripts: none
Path: Games-and-Economic-Behavior-Skills/skills/geb-contribution-framing/SKILL.md
Open the folder on GitHub →
Where it comes from
Stars: 984 · +31 this week
Language: Stata
Read our review of the source →

Weekly change comes from our own snapshots, not the repository page — it measures attention, not adoption.

From the SKILL.md

# Contribution Framing (geb-contribution-framing) ## When to trigger - The introduction lists what you did but never states what is *new for game theory* - A reader finishes the intro unsure whether to be impressed - The contribution is buried under setup, notation, or related work - You are about to write the cover letter and need a crisp claim ## Why framing decides the desk screen At GEB the chief editor routes each paper to one of **seven Editors** as the **Editor in Charge**, who can desk-reject before any referee sees it — about **one-third of submissions are desk-rejected**. That Editor is a game theorist reading many papers; the advance must be unmistakable in the abstract and first page. With only **~15%** of submissions ultimately published, a paper whose contribution is implicit competes poorly against one that states it plainly. Framing is not spin — it is making a real advance legible fast. ## The GEB contribution sentence Write one sentence of the form: > "We show that [class of games / setting] admits [result], which [generalizes / overturns / characterizes / mechanizes] [prior understanding], implying [consequence for theory or applications]." Then test it: - **Is i

What's inside
Steps it walks through
  1. When to trigger
  2. Why framing decides the desk screen
  3. The GEB contribution sentence
  4. Structure the claim cascade
  5. Worked micro-example: sharpening the sentence
  6. Reuse the sentence across the submission package
  7. Anti-patterns
  8. Contribution pass for Games and Economic Behavior
  9. Output format
More from Awesome-Journal-Skills
All skills →
About this skill
What does the geb-contribution-framing skill do?

Use when the "what does this advance in game theory?" sentence is missing or muddy for a Games and Economic Behavior (GEB) manuscript. Forges the single-sentence contribution and the introduction's claim structure so the Editor in Charge sees the advance immediately.

How do I install it?

Run `npx skills add brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills --skill geb-contribution-framing --agent claude-code` — it drops the skill into your project so the agent can pick it up. Swap the --agent value for codex, cursor or copilot if you use one of those.

Where does this skill come from?

From brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills, a repository with 984 stars. We read it straight from the repository tree rather than a submitted listing, so what you see here is what is actually published.

Is a popular skill a good skill?

Not necessarily. Stars measure attention, not adoption — a repository can trend for a week and be abandoned. That is why we show the weekly change from our own snapshots next to the total, instead of a single flattering number.

Keep going