Agent skill

fast-reproducibility

Use when strengthening USENIX FAST reproducibility and open-science evidence, covering device and firmware provenance, device-state disclosure, trace availability and replay, claim-to-evidence mapping, honest degrees of reproducibility on hardware that ages and varies, and consistency between what the paper says and what the artifact contains.

brycew6m4,252★ · +31/wk · 3 repos on radarProfile →
claude-codeMIT
Install
npx skills add brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills --skill fast-reproducibility --agent claude-code

Same command for any agent — swap --agent for codex, cursor, copilot.

Facts
Files in the skill folder: 1
SKILL.md size: 6 KB
Bundled scripts: none
Path: FAST-Skills/skills/fast-reproducibility/SKILL.md
Open the folder on GitHub →
Where it comes from
Stars: 984 · +31 this week
Language: Stata
Read our review of the source →

Weekly change comes from our own snapshots, not the repository page — it measures attention, not adoption.

From the SKILL.md

# FAST Reproducibility Use this before submission and again before camera-ready. FAST's storage results live on **real hardware that ages, throttles, and varies part-to-part**, so reproducibility here is a distinct craft from software-only venues: a reader reproducing your work needs to know not just the code but the *device, its firmware, and its state*. The goal is that a competent reader with comparable hardware could rebuild your evidence and reach your conclusions. ## Evidence map - Map each claim and reported number to a **verifiable location** — a paper section, a table generated from a logged run, or a script in the artifact. - For a system, give enough of the design, parameters, mkfs/mount options, and build environment that a reader could rebuild and run it. - For measurements, report the **device provenance** (models, firmware, interface), the **host** (CPU, RAM, kernel), and the **device state** (steady-state/aged, fill, TRIM) — the storage-only provenance that software artifacts omit. - Keep the **availability statement** truthful and specific: what code and traces are shared, where they will live after acceptance, and — if something cannot be shared — exactly why. - K

What's inside
Steps it walks through
  1. Evidence map
  2. Availability statement audit
  3. Provenance pinning
  4. Degrees of reproducibility (state the one you achieved)
  5. The hardware-variance caveat (state it plainly)
  6. Vignette: a file-system aging study
  7. Consistency and camera-ready pass
  8. Output format
More from Awesome-Journal-Skills
All skills →
About this skill
What does the fast-reproducibility skill do?

Use when strengthening USENIX FAST reproducibility and open-science evidence, covering device and firmware provenance, device-state disclosure, trace availability and replay, claim-to-evidence mapping, honest degrees of reproducibility on hardware that ages and varies, and consistency between what the paper says and what the artifact contains.

How do I install it?

Run `npx skills add brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills --skill fast-reproducibility --agent claude-code` — it drops the skill into your project so the agent can pick it up. Swap the --agent value for codex, cursor or copilot if you use one of those.

Where does this skill come from?

From brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills, a repository with 984 stars. We read it straight from the repository tree rather than a submitted listing, so what you see here is what is actually published.

Is a popular skill a good skill?

Not necessarily. Stars measure attention, not adoption — a repository can trend for a week and be abandoned. That is why we show the weekly change from our own snapshots next to the total, instead of a single flattering number.

Keep going