facct-supplementary
Use when deciding what belongs in an ACM FAccT paper body versus its endmatter statements, appendices, and supplementary material — the 14-page acmart budget, the extra endmatter page for ethics/adverse-impacts statements, the rule that decision-critical evidence stays in the reviewed pages, mutually-anonymous supplementary material, and how to split an interdisciplinary paper between body, endmatter, and artifact.
Profile →npx skills add brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills --skill facct-supplementary --agent claude-code
Same command for any agent — swap --agent for codex, cursor, copilot.
Weekly change comes from our own snapshots, not the repository page — it measures attention, not adoption.
# FAccT Supplementary Use this when assembling FAccT supplementary material. Two rules govern the split. First, the familiar one: **the paper must be judgeable from the reviewed pages alone** — appendices and released artifacts support the paper, they do not hold the argument. Second, the FAccT-specific one: the **endmatter statements** (Generative AI Usage, Ethical Considerations, Adverse Impacts, Positionality) are a distinct zone with their own page allowance and their own anonymity rules — get that zone right or risk a policy problem independent of the paper's quality. ## The three zones | Zone | Counts toward the 14-page limit? | Anonymity at submission | |---|---|---| | Body (intro → limitations) | Yes (up to 14; 15 if Revised/accepted) | Anonymous | | Endmatter statements | No — one extra content page allowed | Mixed (see below) | | Appendix / supplementary / released artifact | Per current CFP — confirm | Anonymous; strip metadata | ## What goes where | Content | Body (within budget) | Endmatter | Appendix / artifact | |---|---|---|---| | The FAccT contribution and who is affected | Yes | — | — | | Core method / study design / argument | Yes | — | Full parameter grids, extr
- The three zones
- What goes where
- The endmatter zone (FAccT-specific, easy to get wrong)
- Mutually-anonymous supplementary rules
- Vignette: splitting a mixed-methods paper
- Output format
What does the facct-supplementary skill do?
Use when deciding what belongs in an ACM FAccT paper body versus its endmatter statements, appendices, and supplementary material — the 14-page acmart budget, the extra endmatter page for ethics/adverse-impacts statements, the rule that decision-critical evidence stays in the reviewed pages, mutually-anonymous supplementary material, and how to split an interdisciplinary paper between body, endmatter, and artifact.
How do I install it?
Run `npx skills add brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills --skill facct-supplementary --agent claude-code` — it drops the skill into your project so the agent can pick it up. Swap the --agent value for codex, cursor or copilot if you use one of those.
Where does this skill come from?
From brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills, a repository with 984 stars. We read it straight from the repository tree rather than a submitted listing, so what you see here is what is actually published.
Is a popular skill a good skill?
Not necessarily. Stars measure attention, not adoption — a repository can trend for a week and be abandoned. That is why we show the weekly change from our own snapshots next to the total, instead of a single flattering number.