Agent skill

expecon-literature-positioning

Use when staking an Experimental Economics (ExpEcon) manuscript's contribution against prior experiments and the behavioral theory it tests. Sharpens positioning; it does not invent results or citations.

brycew6m4,252★ · +31/wk · 3 repos on radarProfile →
claude-codeMIT
Install
npx skills add brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills --skill expecon-literature-positioning --agent claude-code

Same command for any agent — swap --agent for codex, cursor, copilot.

Facts
Files in the skill folder: 1
SKILL.md size: 8 KB
Bundled scripts: none
Path: Experimental-Economics-Skills/skills/expecon-literature-positioning/SKILL.md
Open the folder on GitHub →
Where it comes from
Stars: 984 · +31 this week
Language: Stata
Read our review of the source →

Weekly change comes from our own snapshots, not the repository page — it measures attention, not adoption.

From the SKILL.md

# Literature Positioning (expecon-literature-positioning) ## When to trigger - A referee or coauthor says "we already know this" — the marginal contribution over existing experiments is unclear - Your design is close to a canonical paradigm (dictator, ultimatum, public goods, trust, beauty contest, double auction) and you must show what is genuinely new - The intro cites behavioral theory but never says which prediction your treatment *adjudicates* - You are unsure whether your novelty is a new **treatment**, a new **method/elicitation**, a **replication**, or a **boundary condition** ## What counts as a contribution here At a method-defined journal, positioning is not "no one has studied topic X." It is "**no prior design could deliver the comparison I deliver**." Locate your paper on this ladder, from weakest to strongest: 1. **Re-label** — same paradigm, new cover story. Usually insufficient on its own. 2. **New boundary condition** — a known effect tested where theory predicts it should vanish/flip; valuable when the prediction is sharp and pre-registered. 3. **Confound removal** — a cleaner control that isolates a mechanism prior designs conflated (e.g., separating altruism fr

What's inside
Steps it walks through
  1. When to trigger
  2. What counts as a contribution here
  3. Positioning the design against its ancestors
  4. Sibling boundary in the lit review
  5. Worked vignette (illustrative)
  6. Three sentences every ExpEcon intro needs
  7. Building the comparison from paradigm building blocks
  8. Checklist
  9. Engaging the methodological critics
  10. Anti-patterns
  11. Positioning a replication or Registered Report
  12. Output format
More from Awesome-Journal-Skills
All skills →
About this skill
What does the expecon-literature-positioning skill do?

Use when staking an Experimental Economics (ExpEcon) manuscript's contribution against prior experiments and the behavioral theory it tests. Sharpens positioning; it does not invent results or citations.

How do I install it?

Run `npx skills add brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills --skill expecon-literature-positioning --agent claude-code` — it drops the skill into your project so the agent can pick it up. Swap the --agent value for codex, cursor or copilot if you use one of those.

Where does this skill come from?

From brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills, a repository with 984 stars. We read it straight from the repository tree rather than a submitted listing, so what you see here is what is actually published.

Is a popular skill a good skill?

Not necessarily. Stars measure attention, not adoption — a repository can trend for a week and be abandoned. That is why we show the weekly change from our own snapshots next to the total, instead of a single flattering number.

Keep going