eurosys-supplementary
Use when deciding what lives outside a EuroSys paper's 12 technical pages — free reference pages, whether the current round permits appendices or supplementary uploads, anonymized artifact repositories linked from the submission, and extended technical reports — without moving decision-critical evidence out of the reviewed pages.
Profile →npx skills add brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills --skill eurosys-supplementary --agent claude-code
Same command for any agent — swap --agent for codex, cursor, copilot.
Weekly change comes from our own snapshots, not the repository page — it measures attention, not adoption.
# EuroSys Supplementary Use this when a EuroSys draft overflows its 12 pages of technical content. The governing fact (EuroSys 2027 CFP, rendered 2026-07-08): the budget is 12 pages of technical content **plus unlimited reference pages**. Whether the current round accepts appendices beyond the references, or a separate supplementary upload in HotCRP, is per-cycle policy that was not verifiable on 2026-07-08 — 待核实 in the live CFP and the HotCRP submission form before relying on either. ## The four shelves | Shelf | Review status | What belongs there | |---|---|---| | 12 technical pages | Fully reviewed, the paper | Design, key mechanisms, headline evaluation, honest limitations | | Reference pages | Free, always allowed | Bibliography only — never technical content disguised as notes | | Anonymized artifact repo | Reviewer-optional | Code, configs, full result sets, extra graphs, raw logs | | Extended tech report / appendix | Only if the round permits (待核实) | Proofs, protocol details, exhaustive parameter sweeps | The iron rule across all shelves: **a reviewer who reads only the 12 pages must be able to accept the paper.** Anything reviewer-optional is corroboration, not argument. I
- The four shelves
- What systems reviewers push outward — and what they don't
- Anonymized repository mechanics
- Reference-page hygiene
- Micro-example: a 13.5-page draft
- Overflow triage, in order
- Coordination with the review timeline
- Output format
Build an identity-clean mirror rather than sanitizing in place git clone --depth 1 file:///lab/systemX systemX-anon && cd systemX-anon rm -rf .git && grep -rInE 'university|lab-name|@|githubusercontent' . | less fix hits, then publish to an anonymous host (e.g., an anonymized-repo service)
What does the eurosys-supplementary skill do?
Use when deciding what lives outside a EuroSys paper's 12 technical pages — free reference pages, whether the current round permits appendices or supplementary uploads, anonymized artifact repositories linked from the submission, and extended technical reports — without moving decision-critical evidence out of the reviewed pages.
How do I install it?
Run `npx skills add brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills --skill eurosys-supplementary --agent claude-code` — it drops the skill into your project so the agent can pick it up. Swap the --agent value for codex, cursor or copilot if you use one of those.
Where does this skill come from?
From brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills, a repository with 984 stars. We read it straight from the repository tree rather than a submitted listing, so what you see here is what is actually published.
Is a popular skill a good skill?
Not necessarily. Stars measure attention, not adoption — a repository can trend for a week and be abandoned. That is why we show the weekly change from our own snapshots next to the total, instead of a single flattering number.