eccv-author-response
Use when drafting an ECCV rebuttal — the optional one-page, two-column PDF answering three-plus reviews inside a nine-day window (reviews May 2, rebuttal due May 11 in 2026), with references counted inside the page, no venue-forbidden extras, and arguments sized for the area-chair discussion that follows.
Profile →npx skills add brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills --skill eccv-author-response --agent claude-code
Same command for any agent — swap --agent for codex, cursor, copilot.
Weekly change comes from our own snapshots, not the repository page — it measures attention, not adoption.
# ECCV Author Response Use this when ECCV reviews land. In the 2026 cycle reviews were released May 2, the rebuttal was due May 11, and reviewers received rebuttals on May 12 — nine calendar days to answer everything. The rebuttal was optional, a single-page PDF **including references**, set in a two-column rebuttal template even though the paper itself is single-column LNCS. ## What the one page is for The rebuttal's real reader is the area chair running the post-rebuttal discussion, not the reviewer who wrote the complaint. Write each block so an AC can lift it directly into a meta-review: objection, answer, pointer into the submitted PDF. - Answer misreadings first — they are the cheapest score to recover. - Answer requests whose evidence already exists in the paper or supplement second; cite figure/table/line numbers, never "see above". - Concede real limitations in one sentence each; a clean concession reads better in discussion than a strained defense. - Skip philosophical disagreements about importance; one page cannot win them. ## Budgeting a page against three reviews | Block | Share of the page | Content rule | |---|---|---| | Header + shared clarification | ~15% | One pa
- What the one page is for
- Budgeting a page against three reviews
- New-experiment judgment
- Nine-day schedule
- Tone calibration for a European generalist panel
- Output format
What does the eccv-author-response skill do?
Use when drafting an ECCV rebuttal — the optional one-page, two-column PDF answering three-plus reviews inside a nine-day window (reviews May 2, rebuttal due May 11 in 2026), with references counted inside the page, no venue-forbidden extras, and arguments sized for the area-chair discussion that follows.
How do I install it?
Run `npx skills add brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills --skill eccv-author-response --agent claude-code` — it drops the skill into your project so the agent can pick it up. Swap the --agent value for codex, cursor or copilot if you use one of those.
Where does this skill come from?
From brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills, a repository with 984 stars. We read it straight from the repository tree rather than a submitted listing, so what you see here is what is actually published.
Is a popular skill a good skill?
Not necessarily. Stars measure attention, not adoption — a repository can trend for a week and be abandoned. That is why we show the weekly change from our own snapshots next to the total, instead of a single flattering number.