design-review-gate
Parallel design review by 6 specialist agents (PM, Architect, Designer, Security Design, UX, CTO) with mandatory unanimous approval.
npx skills add a5c-ai/babysitter --skill design-review-gate --agent claude-code
Same command for any agent — swap --agent for codex, cursor, copilot.
Weekly change comes from our own snapshots, not the repository page — it measures attention, not adoption.
- When validating a new feature design - When introducing new architectural patterns ## Process 1. Run 6 reviews in parallel: PM, Architect, Designer, Security Design, UX, CTO 2. All 6 must approve (unanimous) 3. If any reject, consolidate findings and iterate 4. Max 3 iterations before escalating to human ## Reviewers | Agent | Focus | |-------|-------| | Product Manager | Use cases, user benefits, scope alignment | | Architect | Architectural fit, patterns, technical debt | | Designer | UX/API design, developer experience | | Security Design | Threat modeling, OWASP Top 10 | | UX Reviewer | Usability, accessibility, user flows | | CTO | TDD readiness, codebase alignment, risk | ## Tool Use Invoke via babysitter process: `methodologies/metaswarm/metaswarm-design-review`
- Process
- Reviewers
- Tool Use
What does the design-review-gate skill do?
Parallel design review by 6 specialist agents (PM, Architect, Designer, Security Design, UX, CTO) with mandatory unanimous approval.
How do I install it?
Run `npx skills add a5c-ai/babysitter --skill design-review-gate --agent claude-code` — it drops the skill into your project so the agent can pick it up. Swap the --agent value for codex, cursor or copilot if you use one of those.
Where does this skill come from?
From a5c-ai/babysitter, a repository with 1,642 stars. We read it straight from the repository tree rather than a submitted listing, so what you see here is what is actually published.
Is a popular skill a good skill?
Not necessarily. Stars measure attention, not adoption — a repository can trend for a week and be abandoned. That is why we show the weekly change from our own snapshots next to the total, instead of a single flattering number.