Agent skill

conbio-conservation-relevance-and-implications

Use when sharpening the conservation significance and actionable implications of a Conservation Biology manuscript. The journal requires results to have direct, transferable implications for conserving biological diversity and to bridge science and practice. Frames the so-what and the recommendations; it does not overstate evidence or fabricate impact.

brycew6m4,252★ · +31/wk · 3 repos on radarProfile →
claude-codeMIT
Install
npx skills add brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills --skill conbio-conservation-relevance-and-implications --agent claude-code

Same command for any agent — swap --agent for codex, cursor, copilot.

Facts
Files in the skill folder: 1
SKILL.md size: 7 KB
Bundled scripts: none
Path: Conservation-Biology-Skills/skills/conbio-conservation-relevance-and-implications/SKILL.md
Open the folder on GitHub →
Where it comes from
Stars: 909 · +31 this week
Language: Stata
Read our review of the source →

Weekly change comes from our own snapshots, not the repository page — it measures attention, not adoption.

From the SKILL.md

# Conservation Relevance & Implications (conbio-conservation-relevance-and-implications) This is the skill that makes a paper a *Conservation Biology* paper. The journal exists to publish science with **direct implications for the conservation of biological diversity**, so the contribution must connect evidence to **decisions** — what to protect, manage, restore, or prioritize — and do so in a way that **travels beyond the focal case**. Sharpen the so-what without over-claiming. ## When to trigger - Drafting the final paragraph of the Introduction and the implications part of the Discussion - A reviewer said the work is "sound but the conservation relevance is unclear" or "too local" - Translating a statistical result into a management or policy recommendation - Deciding whether the framing fits an **Essay** or **Conservation Practice and Policy** instead ## Build the conservation argument 1. **State the decision.** Whose decision does this inform — a manager, an agency, a planner, a community? What action becomes better-supported by your result? 2. **Make implications proportional to evidence.** Recommend exactly what the design supports, with its uncertainty. A correlational resu

What's inside
Steps it walks through
  1. When to trigger
  2. Build the conservation argument
  3. The actionability test (journal-specific)
  4. The proportionality ladder (match the claim to the design)
  5. Before → after: an implications paragraph
  6. Anti-patterns
  7. Operating pass for Conservation Biology
  8. Output format
  9. Supplementary resources
More from Awesome-Journal-Skills
All skills →
About this skill
What does the conbio-conservation-relevance-and-implications skill do?

Use when sharpening the conservation significance and actionable implications of a Conservation Biology manuscript. The journal requires results to have direct, transferable implications for conserving biological diversity and to bridge science and practice. Frames the so-what and the recommendations; it does not overstate evidence or fabricate impact.

How do I install it?

Run `npx skills add brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills --skill conbio-conservation-relevance-and-implications --agent claude-code` — it drops the skill into your project so the agent can pick it up. Swap the --agent value for codex, cursor or copilot if you use one of those.

Where does this skill come from?

From brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills, a repository with 909 stars. We read it straight from the repository tree rather than a submitted listing, so what you see here is what is actually published.

Is a popular skill a good skill?

Not necessarily. Stars measure attention, not adoption — a repository can trend for a week and be abandoned. That is why we show the weekly change from our own snapshots next to the total, instead of a single flattering number.

Keep going