Agent skill

commres-rebuttal

Use when revising a Communication Research (CR) manuscript after a revise-and-resubmit. CR requires two independent reviews to advance, so the hard problem is satisfying two quantitatively demanding referees — often on measurement, mediation, and confounds — inside the 45-page limit. Plans the revision and response memo; it does not fabricate new results.

brycew6m4,252★ · +31/wk · 3 repos on radarProfile →
claude-codeMIT
Install
npx skills add brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills --skill commres-rebuttal --agent claude-code

Same command for any agent — swap --agent for codex, cursor, copilot.

Facts
Files in the skill folder: 1
SKILL.md size: 6 KB
Bundled scripts: none
Path: Communication-Research-Skills/skills/commres-rebuttal/SKILL.md
Open the folder on GitHub →
Where it comes from
Stars: 909 · +31 this week
Language: Stata
Read our review of the source →

Weekly change comes from our own snapshots, not the repository page — it measures attention, not adoption.

From the SKILL.md

# R&R Revision & Response (commres-rebuttal) A CR R&R is won by satisfying **two independent expert reviewers** at once (CR needs two reviews to back a Revise/Accept), usually on **measurement validity, the tested mechanism, and confound control** — and you must do it inside the **45-page (double-spaced, inclusive of references)** limit. This skill is about that brokering and the page budget, not about inventing data. ## When to trigger - A CR R&R arrived and you are scoping the revision before touching the manuscript - Two reviewers want changes that partly conflict (e.g., more controls vs. a cleaner model) - Required additions threaten to push the paper over the page limit - You are writing the cover memo to the editor ## Step 1 — Map the two reviewers' demands before you write anything For each reviewer, label what "convincing" means: stronger **measurement** (CFA, reliability, discriminant validity), a tighter **mechanism** (better mediation identification, manipulated mediator, bootstrap CIs), **confound/CMV** control, or **robustness**. CR's two-review rule means a single enthusiastic reviewer cannot carry the paper — identify the **skeptical** reviewer and make sure the revi

What's inside
Steps it walks through
  1. When to trigger
  2. Step 1 — Map the two reviewers' demands before you write anything
  3. Step 2 — Decide each comment with the page budget in view
  4. Step 3 — Answer the recurring CR demands on their own terms
  5. Step 4 — Keep the revision submittable
  6. Response memo structure (per reviewer, then a global note)
  7. Anti-patterns
  8. Output format
  9. Supplementary resources
More from Awesome-Journal-Skills
All skills →
About this skill
What does the commres-rebuttal skill do?

Use when revising a Communication Research (CR) manuscript after a revise-and-resubmit. CR requires two independent reviews to advance, so the hard problem is satisfying two quantitatively demanding referees — often on measurement, mediation, and confounds — inside the 45-page limit. Plans the revision and response memo; it does not fabricate new results.

How do I install it?

Run `npx skills add brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills --skill commres-rebuttal --agent claude-code` — it drops the skill into your project so the agent can pick it up. Swap the --agent value for codex, cursor or copilot if you use one of those.

Where does this skill come from?

From brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills, a repository with 909 stars. We read it straight from the repository tree rather than a submitted listing, so what you see here is what is actually published.

Is a popular skill a good skill?

Not necessarily. Stars measure attention, not adoption — a repository can trend for a week and be abandoned. That is why we show the weekly change from our own snapshots next to the total, instead of a single flattering number.

Keep going