Agent skill

colt-artifact-evaluation

Use when deciding what evidence package a COLT (Conference on Learning Theory) paper needs, given that COLT runs no artifact-evaluation track or badges — the proof appendix is the artifact. Covers proof-verification passes, optional code companions for numerics, formalization aids, and post-acceptance release of scripts.

brycew6m4,252★ · +31/wk · 3 repos on radarProfile →
claude-codeMIT
Install
npx skills add brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills --skill colt-artifact-evaluation --agent claude-code

Same command for any agent — swap --agent for codex, cursor, copilot.

Facts
Files in the skill folder: 1
SKILL.md size: 7 KB
Bundled scripts: none
Path: COLT-Skills/skills/colt-artifact-evaluation/SKILL.md
Open the folder on GitHub →
Where it comes from
Stars: 909 · +31 this week
Language: Stata
Read our review of the source →

Weekly change comes from our own snapshots, not the repository page — it measures attention, not adoption.

From the SKILL.md

# COLT Artifact Evaluation First, the honest framing: **COLT has no artifact-evaluation track, no artifact badges, and no code-submission requirement.** Nothing of the kind appears in the COLT 2026 Call for Papers or conference pages (checked 2026-07-08). Do not import NeurIPS/ICML-style artifact checklists into a COLT plan; they answer questions this venue does not ask. What replaces artifact review at COLT is the referee's line-by-line reading of your proofs — so this skill treats the proof appendix as the artifact and tells you how to make it verifiable. ## What replaces the artifact track | At an artifact-track venue | The COLT counterpart | Who "evaluates" it | |---|---|---| | Code repository with run scripts | Complete proofs in the same PDF | Reviewers, line by line | | Reproducibility checklist form | Explicit assumption and constant bookkeeping | Reviewers and the AC | | Artifact badge | Community trust that the argument closes | Readers citing the bound | | Dockerized environment | Self-contained lemma dependencies | Anyone re-deriving the result | | Benchmark seeds and configs | Scripts for illustrative numerics, if any | Discretionary reader interest | ## The proof appe

What's inside
Steps it walks through
  1. What replaces the artifact track
  2. The proof appendix as artifact
  3. A verification ledger you can actually run
  4. When code exists anyway
  5. Worked vignette: packaging a bandit paper's evidence
  6. Post-acceptance release checklist
  7. What not to do
  8. Cycle-volatility warnings
  9. Output format
More from Awesome-Journal-Skills
All skills →
About this skill
What does the colt-artifact-evaluation skill do?

Use when deciding what evidence package a COLT (Conference on Learning Theory) paper needs, given that COLT runs no artifact-evaluation track or badges — the proof appendix is the artifact. Covers proof-verification passes, optional code companions for numerics, formalization aids, and post-acceptance release of scripts.

How do I install it?

Run `npx skills add brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills --skill colt-artifact-evaluation --agent claude-code` — it drops the skill into your project so the agent can pick it up. Swap the --agent value for codex, cursor or copilot if you use one of those.

Where does this skill come from?

From brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills, a repository with 909 stars. We read it straight from the repository tree rather than a submitted listing, so what you see here is what is actually published.

Is a popular skill a good skill?

Not necessarily. Stars measure attention, not adoption — a repository can trend for a week and be abandoned. That is why we show the weekly change from our own snapshots next to the total, instead of a single flattering number.

Keep going