Agent skill · Data & Analytics

adjudication-sheets

Build human adjudication / hand-labeling sheets from LLM-pipeline data without evidence truncation. Use when: (1) preparing a CSV/Excel sheet for a human to rule on cases an LLM classifier or rater panel judged, (2) a labeler reports "there is no information to label from" or cells look empty in Excel, (3) excerpt columns cluster at one exact length (e.g. all 1,500 chars — a hard truncation cap). Covers: full rating-basis recovery, Excel 32,767-char cell cap, multi-line CSV mangling, ruling dropdowns, companion text files.

kennethkhoocygithub.com/kennethkhoocyGitHub ↗
claude-codecodexMIT
Install
npx skills add kennethkhoocy/applied-micro-skills --skill adjudication-sheets --agent claude-code

Same command for any agent — swap --agent for codex, cursor, copilot.

Facts
Files in the skill folder: 2
SKILL.md size: 5 KB
Bundled scripts: none
Version: 1.1.0
Declared author: Claude Code
Path: plugins/applied-micro/skills/adjudication-sheets/SKILL.md
Open the folder on GitHub →
Where it comes from
Stars: 54
Language: Python

Weekly change comes from our own snapshots, not the repository page — it measures attention, not adoption.

From the SKILL.md

# Human Adjudication Sheets from LLM-Pipeline Data ## Problem Adjudication sheets built from pipeline intermediates tend to carry truncated "excerpt" columns (previews made for machine diffing, not human judging). A human asked to rule "does this text show X?" on a fragment produces invalid rulings: the decisive sentence may sit past the cutoff. Separately, multi-line text in CSV cells renders as broken rows/empty cells in Excel, so the labeler reports "there is no data here" even when the column is populated. ## Context / Trigger Conditions - A labeler says the sheet has "no information" — check for embedded newlines in CSV fields first. - Excerpt lengths cluster at an exact value (all 1,204 / 1,500 / 800 chars) or end with "[…]" — that is a hard cap, not natural length. - The ruling question is "does the record/text show X?" — the ruling basis must be byte-identical to what the classifier/raters saw, or the ruling grades a different object. ## Solution 1. **Trace the true rating basis from the scoring code, not from intermediates.** Find the line where text is passed to the model (e.g. `prompt = ... + text`) and reproduce that construction exactly. Verify: stored excerpt == full_

What's inside
Steps it walks through
  1. Problem
  2. Context / Trigger Conditions
  3. Solution
  4. Verification
  5. Example
  6. Notes
Ships with 1 file
  • README.md
More from applied-micro-skills
All skills →
About this skill
What does the adjudication-sheets skill do?

Build human adjudication / hand-labeling sheets from LLM-pipeline data without evidence truncation. Use when: (1) preparing a CSV/Excel sheet for a human to rule on cases an LLM classifier or rater panel judged, (2) a labeler reports "there is no information to label from" or cells look empty in Excel, (3) excerpt columns cluster at one exact length (e.g. all 1,500 chars — a hard truncation cap). Covers: full rating-basis recovery, Excel 32,767-char cell cap, multi-line CSV mangling, ruling dropdowns, companion text files.

How do I install it?

Run `npx skills add kennethkhoocy/applied-micro-skills --skill adjudication-sheets --agent claude-code` — it drops the skill into your project so the agent can pick it up. Swap the --agent value for codex, cursor or copilot if you use one of those.

Where does this skill come from?

From kennethkhoocy/applied-micro-skills, a repository with 54 stars. We read it straight from the repository tree rather than a submitted listing, so what you see here is what is actually published.

Is a popular skill a good skill?

Not necessarily. Stars measure attention, not adoption — a repository can trend for a week and be abandoned. That is why we show the weekly change from our own snapshots next to the total, instead of a single flattering number.

Keep going