Agent skill · Backend & API

deepresearch-search

Stage 2b of the lit review pipeline: run a Google Gemini Deep Research deep search (Interactions API) from the brief produced by Stage 0, then parse the cited report into the pipeline schema. API-driven (GEMINI_API_KEY), no browser. An alternative deep-search pathway alongside Undermind (Stage 1) and Scholar Labs (Stage 2). Only use this skill when explicitly requested. Do NOT auto-trigger on general literature review or paper search requests.

kennethkhoocygithub.com/kennethkhoocyGitHub ↗
claude-codecodexships scriptsMIT
Install
npx skills add kennethkhoocy/applied-micro-skills --skill deepresearch-search --agent claude-code

Same command for any agent — swap --agent for codex, cursor, copilot.

Facts
Files in the skill folder: 3
SKILL.md size: 6 KB
Bundled scripts: yes
Path: plugins/applied-micro/skills/lit-review-orchestrator/deepresearch-search/SKILL.md
Open the folder on GitHub →
Where it comes from
Stars: 54
Language: Python

Weekly change comes from our own snapshots, not the repository page — it measures attention, not adoption.

From the SKILL.md

# Deep Research Search (Stage 2b) Takes the Stage-0 brief and uses the **Gemini Deep Research Agent** to autonomously plan, search, read, and synthesize the prior literature, then parses the resulting cited report into `<stem>.json` + `<stem>.bib` for dedup and screening. It complements the other deep searches: Undermind and Scholar Labs are browser-driven; this one is a pure API call. The stage is two halves: - **`scripts/deepresearch_search.py`** — calls the Interactions API (`deep-research-max-preview-04-2026` by default), runs the task in the background, polls to completion, and saves the report + raw response. - **`scripts/deepresearch_ingest.py`** — UI-independent parsing. It reads the agent's `KEY PAPERS` section (and, as a fallback, citations in the raw response), best-effort-enriches via Crossref, and writes the pipeline JSON. Importable, and runnable standalone on a saved report. ## The flow `brief` → wrapped into a literature-review prompt that ends with a parseable `KEY PAPERS` section (`Title | Authors | Year | Venue | DOI or URL`, one per line) → `POST /v1beta/interactions` with `background=true`, `store=true`, agent `deep-research-max-preview-04-2026` → poll `GET /v1

What's inside
Steps it walks through
  1. The flow
  2. Why an API, not a browser
  3. API key
  4. Cost
  5. CLI
  6. Graceful degradation
  7. Source extraction
  8. Output schema
  9. Notes / limitations
Ships with 2 files
  • scripts/deepresearch_ingest.py
  • scripts/deepresearch_search.py
Commands it runs
Driven by the orchestrator (the normal path)
python scripts/deepresearch_search.py --query-file undermind_brief.txt \
Re-parse a saved report (no API call)
python scripts/deepresearch_ingest.py --report debug_deepresearch/deepresearch_report.md \
More from applied-micro-skills
All skills →
About this skill
What does the deepresearch-search skill do?

Stage 2b of the lit review pipeline: run a Google Gemini Deep Research deep search (Interactions API) from the brief produced by Stage 0, then parse the cited report into the pipeline schema. API-driven (GEMINI_API_KEY), no browser. An alternative deep-search pathway alongside Undermind (Stage 1) and Scholar Labs (Stage 2). Only use this skill when explicitly requested. Do NOT auto-trigger on general literature review or paper search requests.

How do I install it?

Run `npx skills add kennethkhoocy/applied-micro-skills --skill deepresearch-search --agent claude-code` — it drops the skill into your project so the agent can pick it up. Swap the --agent value for codex, cursor or copilot if you use one of those.

Where does this skill come from?

From kennethkhoocy/applied-micro-skills, a repository with 54 stars. We read it straight from the repository tree rather than a submitted listing, so what you see here is what is actually published.

Is a popular skill a good skill?

Not necessarily. Stars measure attention, not adoption — a repository can trend for a week and be abandoned. That is why we show the weekly change from our own snapshots next to the total, instead of a single flattering number.

Keep going