Agent skill · Code Review & Quality

wp-literature-positioning

Use when positioning a World Politics manuscript against the comparative-politics and international-relations literatures so it reads as a contribution that travels across cases. World Politics expects engagement with both theoretical and substantive literatures; the move is to locate the paper in a live cross-case debate, not a single-country conversation. Stakes the contribution; it does not write the lit review.

brycew6m878★ · +32/wk · 1 repos on radarProfile →
claude-codeMIT
Install
npx skills add brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills --skill wp-literature-positioning --agent claude-code

Same command for any agent — swap --agent for codex, cursor, copilot.

Facts
Files in the skill folder: 1
SKILL.md size: 6 KB
Bundled scripts: none
Path: World-Politics-Skills/skills/wp-literature-positioning/SKILL.md
Open the folder on GitHub →
Where it comes from
Stars: 909 · +31 this week
Language: Stata
Read our review of the source →

Weekly change comes from our own snapshots, not the repository page — it measures attention, not adoption.

From the SKILL.md

# Literature Positioning (wp-literature-positioning) World Politics expects every article to **engage with theoretical and substantive literatures** and to draw conclusions of broad importance. Positioning is therefore not throat-clearing — it locates the paper in a **comparative-politics or IR debate that crosses cases**, where the contribution is visible to scholars beyond one country or region. ## When to trigger - Drafting or revising the introduction and the "contribution" paragraph - A reviewer said you "missed obvious work" or "don't engage the debate" - Your single-case literature is solid but the paper doesn't connect to a general debate - You need to distinguish your contribution from the closest prior comparative/IR work - Building a **review article**, where the literature *is* the object of analysis ## How World Politics wants the literature engaged 1. **Engage the debate, not a pile of citations.** Identify the live theoretical disagreement or open question your paper speaks to in comparative politics or IR, and cite the works that *define* it. 2. **Connect the case to the general.** A study of one or a few cases must engage the **cross-case theory** it bears on. Show

What's inside
Steps it walks through
  1. When to trigger
  2. How World Politics wants the literature engaged
  3. Review-article positioning (a distinctive World Politics format)
  4. Anti-patterns
  5. Referee-pushback patterns and the venue-specific fix
  6. Worked micro-example (illustrative)
  7. Output format
  8. Supplementary resources
More from Awesome-Journal-Skills
All skills →
About this skill
What does the wp-literature-positioning skill do?

Use when positioning a World Politics manuscript against the comparative-politics and international-relations literatures so it reads as a contribution that travels across cases. World Politics expects engagement with both theoretical and substantive literatures; the move is to locate the paper in a live cross-case debate, not a single-country conversation. Stakes the contribution; it does not write the lit review.

How do I install it?

Run `npx skills add brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills --skill wp-literature-positioning --agent claude-code` — it drops the skill into your project so the agent can pick it up. Swap the --agent value for codex, cursor or copilot if you use one of those.

Where does this skill come from?

From brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills, a repository with 909 stars. We read it straight from the repository tree rather than a submitted listing, so what you see here is what is actually published.

Is a popular skill a good skill?

Not necessarily. Stars measure attention, not adoption — a repository can trend for a week and be abandoned. That is why we show the weekly change from our own snapshots next to the total, instead of a single flattering number.

Keep going