worlddev-rebuttal

npx skills add brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills --skill worlddev-rebuttal --agent claude-code

Same command for any agent — swap --agent for codex, cursor, copilot.

# Rebuttal Strategy (worlddev-rebuttal) ## When to trigger - A WD decision letter arrived: major revision, minor revision, or reject-and-resubmit - Two referees pull in opposite directions (the methodologist vs. the contextualist split) - A referee misread the paper and the instinct is to argue rather than to clarify - The required changes are large and you must triage what to do vs. what to defend - You are deciding whether to resubmit to WD or redirect to a sibling ## Reading a WD decision letter WD revisions are shaped by **double-anonymized, multidisciplinary** review, so two patterns recur. First, the **editor's letter is the binding contract** — referee reports advise, the editor decides; weight the editor's framing above any single referee. Second, because referees come from different evidentiary cultures, you will often face **conflicting demands**: one wants tighter identification, the other wants thicker context or reflexivity. You cannot satisfy both by capitulating to each; you must find the synthesis the editor will accept, and say so explicitly. Treat a reject-and-resubmit as a genuine second chance — WD uses it as a substantive invitation, not a soft no, but the bar