Agent skill · Code Review & Quality

wber-topic-selection

Use when deciding whether a development-economics question fits The World Bank Economic Review (WBER) — and how to frame it so both halves of the WBER bar (credible empirics AND policy relevance) are visible. Locks the question and outlet; it does not run the analysis or write the prose.

brycew6m878★ · +32/wk · 1 repos on radarProfile →
claude-codeMIT
Install
npx skills add brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills --skill wber-topic-selection --agent claude-code

Same command for any agent — swap --agent for codex, cursor, copilot.

Facts
Files in the skill folder: 1
SKILL.md size: 7 KB
Bundled scripts: none
Path: World-Bank-Economic-Review-Skills/skills/wber-topic-selection/SKILL.md
Open the folder on GitHub →
Where it comes from
Stars: 909 · +31 this week
Language: Stata
Read our review of the source →

Weekly change comes from our own snapshots, not the repository page — it measures attention, not adoption.

From the SKILL.md

# Topic Selection (wber-topic-selection) ## When to trigger - You have a developing-country result but are unsure it is "general" enough for WBER - The work could plausibly go to JDE, World Development, the Research Observer, or WBER and the outlet is undecided - The paper reads like a single-program project report rather than evidence on a mechanism - A reviewer or coauthor says "interesting, but is this a *World Bank* paper?" - You are weighing a full-length article vs. a WBER short-format policy note ## The WBER two-part bar WBER's stated mission is to publish innovative theoretical and empirical research that **identifies, analyzes, measures, and evaluates** the macro- and micro-economic forces that promote or impede **economic development**. The selection test is a logical AND, not an OR: 1. **Credible empirics** — a design or measurement that a sophisticated applied economist trusts (this is the JDE-grade half). 2. **Development-policy relevance** — the result changes how a development practitioner, finance ministry, or World Bank task team would think or act. Importantly, "policy-relevant" does *not* mean "aligned with World Bank policy": editorial independence is explicit —

What's inside
Steps it walks through
  1. When to trigger
  2. The WBER two-part bar
  3. Decision table by candidate paper
  4. How to sharpen the question
  5. Full-length vs. short-format
  6. Worked vignette (illustrative)
  7. Checklist
  8. Anti-patterns
  9. The desk-reject screen
  10. Output format
More from Awesome-Journal-Skills
All skills →
About this skill
What does the wber-topic-selection skill do?

Use when deciding whether a development-economics question fits The World Bank Economic Review (WBER) — and how to frame it so both halves of the WBER bar (credible empirics AND policy relevance) are visible. Locks the question and outlet; it does not run the analysis or write the prose.

How do I install it?

Run `npx skills add brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills --skill wber-topic-selection --agent claude-code` — it drops the skill into your project so the agent can pick it up. Swap the --agent value for codex, cursor or copilot if you use one of those.

Where does this skill come from?

From brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills, a repository with 909 stars. We read it straight from the repository tree rather than a submitted listing, so what you see here is what is actually published.

Is a popular skill a good skill?

Not necessarily. Stars measure attention, not adoption — a repository can trend for a week and be abandoned. That is why we show the weekly change from our own snapshots next to the total, instead of a single flattering number.

Keep going