vergabe-nachpruefung-aussicht

What it does

Evaluates the prospects of a Vergabenachprüfungsverfahren (post-t challenge) for a lawyer or bidder, guiding the user to determine engagement viability, deadlines, and strategic options. Produces a structured output: an Erfolgsaussichts-Gutachten (prospect assessment) and a strategy recommendation. Includes references to relevant norms and potential procedural steps, focusing on whether to pursue an application or seek alternative paths. The workflow starts with clarifying roles, outputs, and deadlines, then checks timing thresholds, gathers norms, identifies the proper recipient and evidence, and ends with a decision on the best path for the client.

How it works

• Clarify who acts, the decision to be made, deadline, and required output.
• Mark deadlines and urgent risks first, keeping them within the specific procurement domain.
• Verify applicable norms live from authoritative sources and avoid generic knowledge.
• Identify the appropriate party to address (client, opponent, authority, or court).
• Gather documents and evidence (administrative files, contracts, notices, expert reports, external evidence) and check for gaps via live checks for current normative changes and administrative practice.
• Produce an output that assesses the likelihood of success for a Nachprüfungsantrag, provides a strategy recommendation, and delineates the mandate-related triage. Reference sections include norms such as GWB provisions and related procedural deadlines. The skill uses a template-like structure to deliver an Erfolgs-Aussichten-Gutachten and a Strategy-Empfehlung; it also cites relevant bars for potential objections and procedural routes.

When to use it

• Use when evaluating the likelihood of success before filing a Nachprüfungsantrag and deciding whether to pursue a remedy, engage in settlement, or pursue faster alternatives.
• Triggered by a scenario where a bidder or client seeks to estimate chances of success and establish strategic options prior to drafting a formal template.

What it can touch

• Tools: claude-code
• It touches normative texts, procedural steps, and draft structures described within the skill; exact file names, sections, and procedural steps are cited within the content provided by the skill.

Caveats

• The skill emphasizes live verification of norms and avoidance of repackaged knowledge; it relies on up-to-date sources and does not quote model knowledge.
• It does not guarantee outcomes; it provides an assessment framework and recommended strategy based on the inputs and norms described in the skill. It adheres to defined procedural steps and does not extrapolate beyond explicit instructions.