uebertragende-sanierung-auslaendischer-office

What it does

The skill evaluates transfer scenarios in insolvency law, specifically Übertragende Sanierung und Asset Deals inside or outside the insolvency plan. It instructs to identify relevant deadlines (Fristen) and risks (Eilrisiken) using only the deadlines and procedural elements from the specific field, and to separate various types of deadlines (Widerspruch, Klage, Einspruch, Rechtsmittel, Verjährung, Verwirkung, Rüge-, Anzeige-, Anmelde- und Ausschlussfristen). It requires verification of the carrying norms in the Insolvency Act (Insolvenzrechts) and distinguishes between different governing claims (Eröffnungsantrag nach Paragraf 13 InsO, Gläubigerantrag nach Paragraf 14 InsO, and Antragspflicht organschaftlicher Vertreter nach Paragraf 15a InsO), ensuring to exclude unrelated areas like Steuerrecht, IDW-Standards, or Auslandsrecht unless there is a concrete interface. It prescribes identifying the responsible authority and correct recipients (Mandant, Gegner, zuständige Behörde oder Gericht, Sachverständige, ggf. EU-/internationale Stelle). It instructs gathering documents and evidence (Verwaltungsakte, Vertragsurkunden, Schriftsätze, Bescheide, Protokolle, Sachverständigengutachten) and to check for gaps, obtain missing records via Akteneinsicht or client inquiry, and perform a Live-Check for day-to-day normative changes and administrative practice.

How it works

• Clarify role, goal, and desired output: determine who acts, what decision is pending, which deadline is running, and which output is needed.
• Mark deadlines and urgent risks first: use only deadlines of the concrete field and file; separate Widerspruch, Klage, Einspruch, Rechtsmittel, Verjährung, Verwirkung, Rüge-, Anzeige-, Anmelde- und Ausschlussfristen; never pull from another field.
• Verify authoritative norms: first inspect the InsO provision in the current law text named in the skill title; separate Eröffnungsantrag nach Paragraf 13 InsO, Gläubigerantrag nach Paragraf 14 InsO, and Antragspflicht organschaftlicher Vertreter nach Paragraf 15a InsO; only add tax, IDW standards, or foreign law when a concrete interface exists.
• Determine the competent authority and correctly select addressees: Mandant, Gegner, zuständige Behörde oder Gericht, Sachverständige, ggf. EU-/internationale Stelle.
• Collect documents and evidence and check for gaps: Verwaltungsakte, Vertragsurkunden, Schriftsätze, Bescheide, Protokolle, Sachverständigengutachten and external evidentiary materials; obtain missing items through file review or client questions; perform a Live-Check for day-to-day norm changes and administrative practice.

When to use it

• Trigger-based use is described by the workflow: start with clarifying questions about role and output; prioritize deadlines and risks; verify the specified Insolvency provisions; identify the responsible entity and recipients; then collect and verify supporting documents. The skill outputs a crisis timeline and an inertia-laden risk radar with immediate steps.

What it can touch

• Tools named: claude-code
• The skill operates with documents (Verwaltungsakte, Vertragsurkunden, Schriftsätze, Bescheide, Protokolle, Sachverständigengutachten) and references to Insolvency Law paragraphs.

Caveats

• No explicit limitations beyond the stated workflow and reliance on live normative changes; the skill emphasizes live verification of norms and avoidance of cross-field injections (e.g., Steuerrecht, IDW-Standards) unless a concrete interface exists; no external legal opinions or blind citations are allowed.