translations-multijurisdictional

What it does

The skill focuses on organizing multijurisdictional translations and documents for corporate law matters. It anchors work in concrete corporate-context steps, including identifying the responsible party, deadlines, and required outputs; verifying controlling norms and sources; and producing outputs such as memos, action lists, or board-ready documents. It emphasizes avoiding cross-domain mixing (e.g., combining corporate/factual assessment with unrelated legal areas) and requires live verification of norms and decisions from primary sources. It also defines structured outputs like a partner-ready memo, Closing-CP-List, or PMO-Board materials, and specifies that routing questions should be used when deadlines or authority are unclear. The skill includes a workflow with steps to inventory sources, separate organizational roles, set materiality thresholds, perform norm checks, build evidentiary chains, create risk matrices, and determine whether to draft or run an information request before hand-off to other skills.

How it works

• Corporate-Kontext fixieren: determine company, form, role, purpose, decision recipient, and deadline status; ask one targeted question if missing. If under time pressure, continue with a placeholder assumption.
• Quellen inventarisieren: list documents with date, version, source, register/urkund IDs and confidentiality; tag uploads as [Mandant], registers as [Register], primary sources as [Primärquelle], and model knowledge as [Modellwissen - prüfen].
• Organ- und Kompetenzebene trennen: differentiate governance bodies and officers.
• Materiality-Schwelle setzen: use a tri-color approach if lacking guidance.
• Normenprüfung durchführen: check jurisdiction-specific rules on authority, form, deadlines, majority, and evidence; rely on primary sources for legal citations.
• Belegkette bauen: attach sources, documents, passages, and uncertainty markers for all key statements; mark unverified items as [zu verifizieren].
• Risikomatrix erstellen: for each point, specify facts, legal question, norm, subsumption, risk color, outcome, and recommended action with owner and deadline.
• Draft oder Review-Gate wählen: provide output if facts suffice; otherwise offer an information request or a template for partner/organ documents.
• Hand-off vorbereiten: move findings into a decision-ready document (e.g., Beschlussentwurf, Board Paper, Registeranmeldung, SPA-Markup, CP-Tracker, Mandantenmail); reference downstream skills.
• Abschlusskontrolle: ensure no unchecked case numbers, no blind citations, no external communications, and no disclosure beyond need-to-know.

When to use it

Triggered by statements like needing a solid next step for multijurisdictional translations and documents, asking for a corporate perspective, or creating a board-ready document. It should not be used when the corporate file itself or mandate role is not sufficiently defined; in that case, direct to the corporate command-center or matter-file skills.

What it can touch

Not explicitly enumerated in this summary; the skill relies on structured workflow, sources, and documents. It references outputs such as memo, Closing-CP-List, and Board- or Beiratsvorlage, suggesting interaction with corporate documents and legal references.

Caveats

• Requires live verification of norms and decisions from primary sources; no model-wissen quotes.
• Outputs must be in fully formed sentences with formal drafting standards; placeholders must be clearly marked.
• No blind citations from non-primary sources; do not rely on extraneous literature without verification.
• Do not merge unrelated legal domains; keep corporate and compliance contexts clearly separated.