Agent skill · Design & Presentation

tool-note-and-vote

Structured group-decision mechanic that captures silent ideation, voting summaries, and Decider sign-off in a single bundled artifact. Use when a small team needs to make a fast decision with diverse input, when groupthink is a risk, or when a workshop moment demands silent contribution before discussion. Applicable to Foundation Sprint, Design Sprint, and any participatory decision context.

product-on-purposegithub.com/product-on-purposeGitHub ↗
claude-codecodexApache-2.0
Install
npx skills add product-on-purpose/pm-skills --skill tool-note-and-vote --agent claude-code

Same command for any agent — swap --agent for codex, cursor, copilot.

Facts
Files in the skill folder: 4
SKILL.md size: 8 KB
Bundled scripts: none
Version: 1.0.0
Declared author: product-on-purpose
Path: skills/tool-note-and-vote/SKILL.md
Open the folder on GitHub →
Where it comes from
Stars: 518
Language: JavaScript

Weekly change comes from our own snapshots, not the repository page — it measures attention, not adoption.

From the SKILL.md

<!-- PM-Skills | https://github.com/product-on-purpose/pm-skills | Apache 2.0 --> # Note-and-Vote Run a structured group decision in 20-30 minutes. Silent contribution surfaces independent thinking before group dynamics narrow the option space; explicit Decider supervote closes the choice. Produces a written audit trail of the decision and the alternatives considered. ## When to Use - A small team (3-10 people) needs to make a fast decision with diverse input. - Groupthink, status bias, or loudest-voice dominance is a real risk. - A workshop or meeting moment demands silent ideation before open discussion. - The decision needs an audit trail (what was considered, why the chosen option won). - Decision authority is clear (a Decider exists and is in the room or available). - Used heavily across Foundation Sprint and Design Sprint at decision moments. ## When NOT to Use - A single person owns the decision and just needs to make it. Use direct judgment. - Consensus has already emerged organically. The voting overhead adds friction without value. - The decision is high-stakes enough to warrant longer deliberation (multi-day investigation, written proposals, formal review). Note-and-Vote

What's inside
Steps it walks through
  1. When to Use
  2. When NOT to Use
  3. The Five-Step Protocol
  4. Step 1: Frame the question
  5. Step 2: Silent ideation
  6. Step 3: Silent voting
  7. Step 4: Brief discussion
  8. Step 5: Decider supervote
  9. Output Structure
  10. Common Pitfalls
  11. Decider Role
  12. Canonical Source
  13. Cross-Family Usage
Ships with 3 files
  • HISTORY.md
  • references/EXAMPLE.md
  • references/TEMPLATE.md
More from pm-skills
All skills →
About this skill
What does the tool-note-and-vote skill do?

Structured group-decision mechanic that captures silent ideation, voting summaries, and Decider sign-off in a single bundled artifact. Use when a small team needs to make a fast decision with diverse input, when groupthink is a risk, or when a workshop moment demands silent contribution before discussion. Applicable to Foundation Sprint, Design Sprint, and any participatory decision context.

How do I install it?

Run `npx skills add product-on-purpose/pm-skills --skill tool-note-and-vote --agent claude-code` — it drops the skill into your project so the agent can pick it up. Swap the --agent value for codex, cursor or copilot if you use one of those.

Where does this skill come from?

From product-on-purpose/pm-skills, a repository with 518 stars. We read it straight from the repository tree rather than a submitted listing, so what you see here is what is actually published.

Is a popular skill a good skill?

Not necessarily. Stars measure attention, not adoption — a repository can trend for a week and be abandoned. That is why we show the weekly change from our own snapshots next to the total, instead of a single flattering number.

Keep going