Agent skill · Code Review & Quality

the-philosophical-review

Use when targeting The Philosophical Review or deciding whether an analytic philosophy manuscript fits this venue. Encodes the journal's fit, the argument-rigor and originality bar, dialectical-engagement expectations, house style and double-blind norms, official-submission re-check, and desk-reject heuristics.

brycew6m878★ · +32/wk · 1 repos on radarProfile →
claude-codeMIT
Install
npx skills add brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills --skill the-philosophical-review --agent claude-code

Same command for any agent — swap --agent for codex, cursor, copilot.

Facts
Files in the skill folder: 1
SKILL.md size: 6 KB
Bundled scripts: none
Path: English-Humanities-Journal-Skills/skills/the-philosophical-review/SKILL.md
Open the folder on GitHub →
Where it comes from
Stars: 909 · +31 this week
Language: Stata
Read our review of the source →

Weekly change comes from our own snapshots, not the repository page — it measures attention, not adoption.

From the SKILL.md

# The Philosophical Review (the-philosophical-review) ## Journal positioning The Philosophical Review is one of the most selective generalist journals in analytic philosophy, publishing full-length articles of the highest quality across all core areas — metaphysics, epistemology, philosophy of mind and language, ethics, and the history of philosophy treated philosophically. Its defining expectation is a **rigorous, original argument** that advances a live debate: a clearly stated thesis, a valid and carefully defended line of reasoning, and decisive engagement with the strongest opposing positions. A competent survey, a small variation on a known move, or a paper that does not engage the best objections is a poor fit. This skill is a **fit / venue-selection / re-framing** aid. It does not replace the journal's current submission guidelines. Before submitting, re-check the live Philosophical Review author instructions. ## When to trigger - The author names The Philosophical Review for an analytic-philosophy article and wants a fit/framing check. - An argument must be sharpened — thesis, structure, and engagement with the strongest objections — to meet a top generalist venue's bar. -

What's inside
Steps it walks through
  1. Journal positioning
  2. When to trigger
  3. Scope & topic fit
  4. Method & evidence bar
  5. Structure & house style
  6. Official-submission checklist
  7. Pre-submission self-check
  8. Common desk-reject triggers
  9. Re-routing decision
  10. Output format
More from Awesome-Journal-Skills
All skills →
About this skill
What does the the-philosophical-review skill do?

Use when targeting The Philosophical Review or deciding whether an analytic philosophy manuscript fits this venue. Encodes the journal's fit, the argument-rigor and originality bar, dialectical-engagement expectations, house style and double-blind norms, official-submission re-check, and desk-reject heuristics.

How do I install it?

Run `npx skills add brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills --skill the-philosophical-review --agent claude-code` — it drops the skill into your project so the agent can pick it up. Swap the --agent value for codex, cursor or copilot if you use one of those.

Where does this skill come from?

From brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills, a repository with 909 stars. We read it straight from the repository tree rather than a submitted listing, so what you see here is what is actually published.

Is a popular skill a good skill?

Not necessarily. Stars measure attention, not adoption — a repository can trend for a week and be abandoned. That is why we show the weekly change from our own snapshots next to the total, instead of a single flattering number.

Keep going